Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28538703›Full record

ReviewViruses2017

Metagenomic Approaches to Assess Bacteriophages in Various Environmental Niches.

Stephen Hayes, Jennifer Mahony, Arjen Nauta, Douwe van Sinderen

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tools and methodology toFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Molecular diagnostic assays for COVID-19: an overview.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen HayesSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. stephen.hayes@umail.ucc.ie.
Jennifer MahonySchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. j.mahony@ucc.ie.
Arjen NautaFriesland Campina, Amersfoort 3800 BN, The Netherlands. Arjen.Nauta@frieslandcampina.com.
Douwe van SinderenSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork T12 YT20, Ireland. d.vansinderen@ucc.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages are ubiquitous and numerous parasites of bacteria and play a critical evolutionary role in virtually every ecosystem, yet our understanding of the extent of the diversity and role of phages remains inadequate for many ecological niches, particularly in cases in which the host is unculturable. During the past 15 years, the emergence of the field of viral metagenomics has drastically enhanced our ability to analyse the so-called viral 'dark matter' of the biosphere. Here, we review the evolution of viral metagenomic methodologies, as well as providing an overview of some of the most significant applications and findings in this field of research.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBacteriophagesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyMetagenomicsmarinemicrobiotaphagevirome

Identifiers

PMID28538703
PMCPMC5490804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.