ReviewNutrients2017
Diet Hypotheses in Light of the Microbiota Revolution: New Perspectives.
Review in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of dietary fibre on the gastrointestinal microbiota during critical illness: A scoping review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Health-Improving Effects of Polyphenols on the Human Intestinal Microbiota: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Is there a role for microbiome-based approach in common variable immunodeficiency?Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Introduction of Complementary Foods and the Risk of Sensitization and Allergy in Children up to Three Years of Age.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Bypassing the Gut-Lung AxisFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Microbial metabolism of L-tyrosine protects against allergic airway inflammation.Nature immunology · 2021Article
- Gut Microbiome and Common Variable Immunodeficiency: Few Certainties and Many Outstanding Questions.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Microbial interactions in the atopic march.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2020Review
- The influence of the microbiome on respiratory health.Nature immunology · 2019Review
- Emerging roles of metabolites of ω3 and ω6 essential fatty acids in the control of intestinal inflammation.International immunology · 2019Review
- Inulin, the gut microbiome and the deeper breath of asthma patients - Novel pathways in asthma treatment.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- Impact of Gut Dysbiosis on Neurohormonal Pathways in Chronic Kidney Disease.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- The Complex Puzzle of Interactions Among Functional Food, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Review
- Nutrition and Allergic Diseases.Nutrients · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From an evolutionary standpoint, allergy has only recently emerged as a significant health problem. Various hypotheses were proposed to explain this, but they all indicated the importance of rapid lifestyle changes, which occurred in industrialized countries in the last few decades. In this review, we discuss evidence from epidemiological and experimental studies that indicate changes in dietary habits may have played an important role in this phenomenon. Based on the example of dietary fiber, we discuss molecular mechanisms behind this and point towards the importance of diet-induced changes in the microbiota. Finally, we reason that future studies unraveling mechanisms governing these changes, along with the development of better tools to manipulate microbiota composition in individuals will be crucial for the design of novel strategies to combat numerous inflammatory disorders, including atopic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.