Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28538183›Full record

ArticleCell reports2017

RUNX1-ETO and RUNX1-EVI1 Differentially Reprogram the Chromatin Landscape in t(8;21) and t(3;21) AML.

Justin Loke, Salam A Assi, Maria Rosaria Imperato, Anetta Ptasinska, Pierre Cauchy, Yura Grabovska, Natalia Martinez Soria, Manoj Raghavan, H Ruud Delwel, Peter N Cockerill and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin LokeInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Salam A AssiInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Maria Rosaria ImperatoInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Anetta PtasinskaInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Pierre CauchyInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Yura GrabovskaNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Natalia Martinez SoriaNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Manoj RaghavanInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
H Ruud DelwelDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter N CockerillInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK.
Olaf HeidenreichNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Constanze BoniferInstitute for Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: c.bonifer@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBNewcastle University · GBErasmus MC · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12788Cancer Research UK 23389Medical Research Council MR/M009157/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease caused by mutations in transcriptional regulator genes, but how different mutant regulators shape the chromatin landscape is unclear. Here, we compared the transcriptional networks of two types of AML with chromosomal translocations of the RUNX1 locus that fuse the RUNX1 DNA-binding domain to different regulators, the t(8;21) expressing RUNX1-ETO and the t(3;21) expressing RUNX1-EVI1. Despite containing the same DNA-binding domain, the two fusion proteins display distinct binding patterns, show differences in gene expression and chromatin landscape, and are dependent on different transcription factors. RUNX1-EVI1 directs a stem cell-like transcriptional network reliant on GATA2, whereas that of RUNX1-ETO-expressing cells is more mature and depends on RUNX1. However, both types of AML are dependent on the continuous expression of the fusion proteins. Our data provide a molecular explanation for the differences in clinical prognosis for these types of AML.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBinding SitesCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalChromatinChromosomes, HumanCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitGATA2 Transcription FactorGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePhenotypeTranslocation, GeneticCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-alphaChromatinCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitGATA2 Transcription Factoracute myeloid leukemiachromatinepigenetic landscapeRUNX1-ETORUNX1-EVI1transcriptional network

Identifiers

PMID28538183
PMCPMC5457485
OpenAlexW2619118648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.