ArticleAdvances in therapy2017
Study Design of VESUTO
Article in Advances in therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02629965 (A Randomised, Double-blinded, Active-controlled 2-way Cross Over Trial to Assess the Effects of 6 Weeks Treatment of Once Daily Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Delivered by RESPIMAT Inhaler Compared With Tiotropium Delivered by RESPIMAT Inhaler on Lung Hyperinflation, Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity in Japanese Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Double-blinded, Active-controlled 2-way Cross Over Trial to Assess the Effects of 6 Weeks Treatment of Once Daily Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Delivered by RESPIMAT Inhaler Compared With Tiotropium Delivered by RESPIMAT Inhaler on Lung Hyperinflation, Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity in Japanese Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of tiotropium/olodaterol on sedentary and active time in patients with COPD: post hoc analysis of the VESUTOInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Trial
- Efficacy of tiotropium/olodaterol on lung volume, exercise capacity, and physical activity.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe superiority of tiotropium/olodaterol is demonstrated in improvement of lung function, dyspnea, lung hyperinflation, and quality of life compared with either monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Japanese Respiratory Society Guidelines for COPD management include improvement of exercise tolerance and daily physical activity as the treatment goals; however, there is limited evidence in Japanese patients with COPD.
methodsA protocol is developed for the VESUTO
resultsA total of 180 Japanese patients with COPD, aged ≥40 years will be enrolled into the double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, crossover study (NCT02629965) and will be randomized to receive either tiotropium/olodaterol FDC or tiotropium for 6 weeks each [two puffs via RESPIMAT
conclusionThe VESUTO
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02629965 (registered on December 1, 2015).
fundingThe VESUTO study was funded by Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.