Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536946›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017

Determinants of the biomechanical and radiological outcome of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: the role of rod properties and patient characteristics.

Fabrizio Giudici, Fabio Galbusera, Antonino Zagra, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Marino Archetti, Laura Scaramuzzo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. 3D-printed drill guide template, a promising tool to improve pedicle screw placement accuracy in spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. A randomized double-blinded clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel superelastic nickel-titanium spinal rod in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Trial
  4. Sagittal alignment correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using patient-specific rods.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabrizio GiudiciSpinal Division I, I.R. C.C. S. Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Fabio GalbuseraI. R. C.C. S. Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Antonino ZagraSpinal Division I, I.R. C.C. S. Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Hans-Joachim WilkeInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research Ulm (ZTF), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Marino ArchettiSpinal Division I, I.R. C.C. S. Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Laura ScaramuzzoSpinal Division I, I.R. C.C. S. Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. scaramuzzolaura@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAim of the study was to evaluate the role of the mechanical properties of the rod and of the characteristics of the patients (age, skeletal maturity, BMI, and Lenke type) in determining the deformity correction, its maintenance over time and the risk of mechanical failure of the instrumentation.

methodsFrom March 2011 to December 2014 120 patients affected by AIS underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Two 5.5-mm CoCr rods were implanted in all patients. For every patient, age, sex, Risser grade, Lenke type curve, flexibility of the main curve, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of correction were recorded. In all patients, the Cobb angle value and rod curvature angle (RC) were evaluated. RC changes were registered and correlated to each factor to establish a possible statistically significance in a multivariate analysis. A biomechanical model was constructed to study the influence of rod diameter and material as well as the density of the anchoring implants in determining stress and deformation of rods after contouring and implantation.

resultsRadiographic and biomechanical analysis showed a different mean rod deformation for concave and convex side: 7.8° and 3.9°, respectively. RC mean value at immediate follow-up was 21.8° for the concave side and 14.6° for the convex. At 2-year minimum follow-up, RC value increases 1.5° only for the concave side. At 3.5-year mean follow-up, RC value increases 2.7°, p = 0.003, for the concave side and 1.3° for the convex, p = 0.06. The use of the stiffest material as well as of the lowest diameter resulted in higher stresses in the rods. The use of either a low or a high instrumentation density resulted only in minor differences in the loss of correction.

conclusionsRod diameter and material as well as patient characteristics such as BMI, age, and Risser grade play an important role in deformity correction and its maintenance over time.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaBody Mass IndexHumansRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularSpineTreatment OutcomeAdolescent scoliosisBiomechanical propertiesCoCr rodRod deformation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.