Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536900›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2017

Hopes for the Future of Pain Control.

Kirsty Bannister, Mateusz Kucharczyk, Anthony H Dickenson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lung Cancer Pain Quality Descriptors: More Similarities Than Differences by Patient Characteristics.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2026
    Article
  2. Towards an individualised approach to pain management in inflammatory arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Evidence for Effective Inhibition ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Heat But Not Mechanical Hypersensitivity Depends on Voltage-Gated CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Capturing Novel Non-opioid Pain Targets.Biological psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Pain: Persistent postsurgery and bone cancer-related pain.The Journal of international medical research · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsty BannisterDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Mateusz KucharczykDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Anthony H DickensonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK. anthony.dickenson@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we aim to present an accessible review of the pharmacological targets for pain management, and succinctly discuss the newest trends in pain therapy. A key task for current pain pharmacotherapy is the identification of receptors and channels orchestrating nociception. Notwithstanding peripheral alterations in the receptors and channels following pathophysiological events, the modulatory mechanisms in the central nervous system are also fundamental to the regulation of pain perception. Bridging preclinical and clinical studies of peripheral and central components of pain modulation, we present the different types of pain and relate these to pharmacological interventions. We firstly highlight the roles of several peripheral nociceptors, such as NGF, CGRP, sodium channels, and TRP-family channels that may become novel targets for therapies. In the central nervous system, the roles of calcium channels and gabapentinoids as well as NMDA receptors in generating excitability are covered including ideas on central sensitization. We then turn to central modulatory systems and discuss opioids and monoamines. We aim to explain the importance of central sensitization and the dialogue of the spinal circuits with the brain descending modulatory controls before discussing a mechanism-based effectiveness of antidepressants in pain therapy and their potential to modulate the descending controls. Emphasizing the roles of conditioned pain modulation and its animal's equivalent, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, we discuss these unique descending modulations as a potential tool for understanding mechanisms in patients suffering from pain. Mechanism-based therapy is the key to picking the correct treatments and recent clinical studies using sensory symptoms of patients as surrogates for underlying mechanisms can be used to subgroup patients and reveal actions of drugs that may be lost when studying heterogenous groups of patients. Key advances in the understanding of basic pain principles will impact our thinking about therapy targets. The complexity of pain syndromes will require tailored pharmacological drugs, often in combination or through drugs with more than one action, and often psychotherapy, to fully control pain.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnti-depressantsCentral sensitizationDescending controlsPain mechanismsPregabalin

Identifiers

PMID28536900
PMCPMC5693804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.