Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536893›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Neurologic Recovery After Cardiac Arrest: a Multifaceted Puzzle Requiring Comprehensive Coordinated Care.

Carolina B Maciel, Mary M Barden, David M Greer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [CARL-Controlled reperfusion of the whole body].Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolina B MacielDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Stroke Service, Directory of Medical Studies, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Mary M BardenDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Stroke Service, Directory of Medical Studies, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
David M GreerDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Stroke Service, Directory of Medical Studies, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. david.greer@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementSurviving cardiac arrest (CA) requires a longitudinal approach with multiple levels of responsibility, including fostering a culture of action by increasing public awareness and training, optimization of resuscitation measures including frequent updates of guidelines and their timely implementation into practice, and optimization of post-CA care. This clearly goes beyond resuscitation and targeted temperature management. Brain-directed physiologic goals should dictate the post-CA management, as accumulating evidence suggests that the degree of hypoxic brain injury is the main determinant of survival, regardless of the etiology of arrest. Early assessment of the need for further hemodynamic and electrophysiologic cardiac interventions, adjusting ventilator settings to avoid hyperoxia/hypoxia while targeting high-normal to mildly elevated PaCO

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestHeart arrestHypoxic-ischemic encephalopathyNeuroprognosticationOutcomes assessmentPost-cardiac arrest syndromeSelf-fulfilling prophecy

Identifiers

PMID28536893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.