ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017
Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is there a role of PSMA-PET in focal therapy planning and follow-up?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Guideline
- Pooled it
- Imaging Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Trial
- Analytical performance of aPROMISE: automated anatomic contextualization, detection, and quantification of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Head-to-head comparison of MRI-based PI-RR scoring system and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT: enhancing prostate cancer recurrence detection after radical prostatectomy.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Reference tissue uptake of [18F]PSMA-1007 in positron emission tomography of recurrent prostate cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Mitigating bladder signal inEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Article
- Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for equivocal lesions in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT according to PSMA-RADS 2.0 criteria.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- A Robust [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- PSMA PET/CT imaging and its application to prostate cancer treatment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Radiotheranostics in advanced prostate cancer: Current and future directions.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Review
- Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients.European radiology · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence Evaluating Metastatic Prostatic Cancer and Lymph Nodes on PSMA PET Scans.Cancers · 2024Review
- Modified PROMISE criteria for standardized interpretation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeted PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- PROMISE V2 - something new, something old and something borrowed.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Article
- Development and external validation of a multivariable [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- PSMA Targeted Molecular Imaging and Radioligand Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Optimal Patient and Treatment Issues.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
methodsAfter primary treatment, biochemical relapse (BCR) occurs in a substantial number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). PET/CT imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen based tracers (68Ga-PSMA) has shown promising results for BCR patients. However, a standardized image interpretation methodology has yet to be properly agreed. The aim of this study, which was promoted and funded by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), is to define standardized image interpretation criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect recurrent PCa lesions in patients treated with primary curative intent therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) who presented a biochemical recurrence. In the first phase inter-rater agreement between seven readers from seven international centers was calculated on the reading of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images of 49 patients with BCR. Each reader evaluated findings in five different sites of recurrence (local, loco-regional lymph nodes, distant lymph nodes, bone, and other). In the second phase the re-analysis was limited to cases with poor, slight, fair, or moderate agreement [Krippendorff's (K) alpha<0.61]. Finally, on the basis of the consensus readings, we sought to define a list of revised consensus criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT interpretation.
resultsBetween-reader agreement for the presence of anomalous findings in any of the five sites was only moderate (K's alpha: 0.47). The agreement improved and became substantial when readers had to judge whether the anomalous findings were suggestive for a pathologic, uncertain, or non-pathologic image (K's alpha: 0.64). K's alpha calculations for each of the five sites of recurrence were also performed and evaluated. First Delphi round was thus conducted. A more detailed definition of the criteria was proposed by the project coordinator, which was then discussed and finally agreed by the seven readers. After the second Delphi round only four cases of disagreement still remained. These were evaluated for a final round, allowing a final agreement table to be written.
conclusionWe hope that by developing these consensus guidelines on the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, clinicians reporting these studies will be able to provide more consistent clinical reports and that within clinical trials, abnormality classifications will be harmonized, allowing more robust assessment of its diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.