Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536833›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Development of standardized image interpretation for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect prostate cancer recurrent lesions.

Stefano Fanti, Silvia Minozzi, Joshua James Morigi, Frederik Giesel, Francesco Ceci, Christian Uprimny, Michael S Hofman, Matthias Eiber, Sarah Schwarzenbock, Paolo Castellucci and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is there a role of PSMA-PET in focal therapy planning and follow-up?Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Imaging Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mitigating bladder signal inEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  9. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Robust [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Development and external validation of a multivariable [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefano FantiNuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia MinozziDepartment of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Joshua James MorigiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia. joshuamorigi@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-5396
Frederik GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Francesco CeciNuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Christian UprimnyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael S HofmanCentre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, 3000, Australia.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarah SchwarzenbockDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Paolo CastellucciNuclear Medicine Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina BellisarioDepartment of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Stéphane ChauvieMedical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Fabrizio BergesioMedical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Louise EmmettDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Irene VirgoliniDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Markus SchwaigerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rodney J HicksCentre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, 3000, Australia.
Bernd J KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Arturo ChitiNuclear Medicine, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITHeidelberg University · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITHumanitas University · ITSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsAfter primary treatment, biochemical relapse (BCR) occurs in a substantial number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). PET/CT imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen based tracers (68Ga-PSMA) has shown promising results for BCR patients. However, a standardized image interpretation methodology has yet to be properly agreed. The aim of this study, which was promoted and funded by European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), is to define standardized image interpretation criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT to detect recurrent PCa lesions in patients treated with primary curative intent therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) who presented a biochemical recurrence. In the first phase inter-rater agreement between seven readers from seven international centers was calculated on the reading of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images of 49 patients with BCR. Each reader evaluated findings in five different sites of recurrence (local, loco-regional lymph nodes, distant lymph nodes, bone, and other). In the second phase the re-analysis was limited to cases with poor, slight, fair, or moderate agreement [Krippendorff's (K) alpha<0.61]. Finally, on the basis of the consensus readings, we sought to define a list of revised consensus criteria for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT interpretation.

resultsBetween-reader agreement for the presence of anomalous findings in any of the five sites was only moderate (K's alpha: 0.47). The agreement improved and became substantial when readers had to judge whether the anomalous findings were suggestive for a pathologic, uncertain, or non-pathologic image (K's alpha: 0.64). K's alpha calculations for each of the five sites of recurrence were also performed and evaluated. First Delphi round was thus conducted. A more detailed definition of the criteria was proposed by the project coordinator, which was then discussed and finally agreed by the seven readers. After the second Delphi round only four cases of disagreement still remained. These were evaluated for a final round, allowing a final agreement table to be written.

conclusionWe hope that by developing these consensus guidelines on the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, clinicians reporting these studies will be able to provide more consistent clinical reports and that within clinical trials, abnormality classifications will be harmonized, allowing more robust assessment of its diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

OligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyConsensusEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRecurrenceReference StandardsEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesBiochemical recurrenceConsensus guidelinesCriteriaPet/CtProstate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

PMID28536833
OpenAlexW2617065467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.