ReviewDer Internist2017
[Anticoagulation-direct oral anticoagulants].
Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Anticoagulation: A Comprehensive Review of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Inflammation and Protease-Activated Receptor Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- [Perioperative management of platelet function and anticoagulation in geriatric patients].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
- [40/m with tachycardia and shortness of breath : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 99].Der Internist · 2021Article
- [Comments on the German consensus statement on prehospital treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients under long-term treatment with novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC)].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- [Prehospital management of acute coronary syndrome in patients on long-term direct oral anticoagulant treatment].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- [Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in geriatric patients-use and limitations of existing guidelines].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have become available, use of anticoagulant treatment has become easier and safer-for patients suffering from thromboembolic diseases as well as for patients with atrial fibrillation: Because of constant bioavailability, fixed dose regimen treatment is possible, monitoring not necessary and severe bleeding complications-particularly intracranial hemorrhages-rare in comparison to vitamin K anticoagulants. To gain all these advantages, it is essential to give DOAC in the correct dosage. Dose reduction of single DOAC has to be considered depending on underlying disease, body weight and renal function. DOAC are not allowed in patients with artificial heart valves, in pregnancy and in children. In case of severe bleeding complications under DOAC treatment, prothrombin complex concentrates is one treatment option. For dabigatran an antidote is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.