ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Its Exploitation for Forage and Cool-Season Grain Legume Breeding.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Genetic Diversity and Genomic Prediction of Secondary Metabolites in Pea Genetic Resources.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A high-density linkage map and fine QTL mapping of architecture, phenology, and yield-related traits in faba bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Including marker x environment interactions improves genomic prediction in red clover (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic prediction for rust resistance in pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genome-wide genotyping data renew knowledge on genetic diversity of a worldwide alfalfa collection and give insights on genetic control of phenology traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Recent advancement in OMICS approaches to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Review
- A Bitter-Sweet Story: Unraveling the Genes Involved in Quinolizidine Alkaloid Synthesis inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Development of PCR-based markers and whole-genome selection model for anthracnose resistance in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.).Journal of applied genetics · 2020Article
- Development and Proof-of-Concept Application of Genome-Enabled Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Pea genomic selection for Italian environments.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Candidate Genes for Flowering Time Variation in Common Bean (Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Article
- A high-density consensus linkage map of white lupin highlights synteny with narrow-leafed lupin and provides markers tagging key agronomic traits.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) may drastically reduce genotyping costs compared with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array platforms. However, it may require optimization for specific crops to maximize the number of available markers. Exploiting GBS-generated markers may require optimization, too (e.g., to cope with missing data). This study aimed (i) to compare elements of GBS protocols on legume species that differ for genome size, ploidy, and breeding system, and (ii) to show successful applications and challenges of GBS data on legume species. Preliminary work on alfalfa and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.