Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536562›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017

Use of Wild Type or Recombinant Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Alternative Treatment for Gastrointestinal Inflammatory Diseases: A Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Mucositis.

Rodrigo D De Oliveira Carvalho, Fillipe L R do Carmo, Alberto de Oliveira Junior, Philippe Langella, Jean-Marc Chatel, Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán, Vasco Azevedo, Marcela S de Azevedo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SlpB Protein Enhances the Probiotic Potential ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo D De Oliveira CarvalhoFederal University of Minas Gerais - Instituto de Ciências BiológicasBelo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fillipe L R do CarmoFederal University of Minas Gerais - Instituto de Ciências BiológicasBelo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alberto de Oliveira JuniorFederal University of Minas Gerais - Instituto de Ciências BiológicasBelo Horizonte, Brazil.
Philippe LangellaMicalis Institute, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Jean-Marc ChatelMicalis Institute, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Luis G Bermúdez-HumaránMicalis Institute, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Vasco AzevedoFederal University of Minas Gerais - Instituto de Ciências BiológicasBelo Horizonte, Brazil.
Marcela S de AzevedoFederal University of Minas Gerais - Instituto de Ciências BiológicasBelo Horizonte, Brazil.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is highly colonized by bacterial communities, which live in a symbiotic relationship with the host in normal conditions. It has been shown that a dysfunctional interaction between the intestinal microbiota and the host immune system, known as dysbiosis, is a very important factor responsible for the development of different inflammatory conditions of the GIT, such as the idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), a complex and multifactorial disorder of the GIT. Dysbiosis has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of other GIT inflammatory diseases such as mucositis usually caused as an adverse effect of chemotherapy. As both diseases have become a great clinical problem, many research groups have been focusing on developing new strategies for the treatment of IBD and mucositis. In this review, we show that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been capable in preventing and treating both disorders in animal models, suggesting they may be ready for clinical trials. In addition, we present the most current studies on the use of wild type or genetically engineered LAB strains designed to express anti-inflammatory proteins as a promising strategy in the treatment of IBD and mucositis.

Indexed as

genetic engineeringinflammatory bowel diseaseslactic acid bacteriaLactococcus lactismucositis

Identifiers

PMID28536562
PMCPMC5422521
OpenAlexW2614060596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.