ArticleScientific reports2017
Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years - a comparison of three tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying neural mediators and cultural moderators of the association between discrimination and depression among Mexican American youth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Relevance of Probabilistic Reversal Learning for Adolescent Drinking Trajectories.Addiction biology · 2025Article
- Task-Rest Reconfiguration Efficiency of the Reward Network Across Adolescence and Its Association With Early Life Stress and Depressive Symptoms.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025Article
- Impact of analytic decisions on test-retest reliability of individual and group estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging: A multiverse analysis using the monetary incentive delay task.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Continuity versus change in latent profiles of emotion regulation and working memory during adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- A Developmental Perspective on Facets of Impulsivity and Brain Activity Correlates From Adolescence to Adulthood.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2022Article
- Associations between peripheral inflammatory markers and amygdala activity and connectivity in response to emotional faces in adolescents.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2022Article
- Reliability of subsequent memory effects in children and adults: The good, the bad, and the hopeful.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- The longitudinal stability of fMRI activation during reward processing in adolescents and young adults.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Individual Differences in Intertemporal Choice.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Threat or thrill? the neural mechanisms underlying the development of anxiety and risk taking in adolescence.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- The YOUth cohort study: MRI protocol and test-retest reliability in adults.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- Reliability of multimodal MRI brain measures in youth at risk for mental illness.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- Alcohol Cue-Induced Ventral Striatum Activity Predicts Subsequent Alcohol Self-Administration.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020Article
- Strengthened Default Mode Network Activation During Delay Discounting in Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa After Partial Weight Restoration: A Longitudinal fMRI Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Intact value-based decision-making during intertemporal choice in women with remitted anorexia nervosa? An fMRI studyJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2020Article
- Age-Related Alterations in Brain Perfusion, Venous Oxygenation, and Oxygen Metabolic Rate of Mice: A 17-Month Longitudinal MRI Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Incorporating neurophysiological measures into clinical assessments: Fundamental challenges and a strategy for addressing them.Psychological assessment · 2019Review
- Intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of US point shear-wave elastography in various organs: evaluation in phantoms and healthy volunteers.European radiology · 2019Article
- Longitudinally consistent estimates of intrinsic functional networks.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Longitudinal developmental fMRI studies just recently began to focus on within-subject reliability using the intraclass coefficient (ICC). It remains largely unclear which degree of reliability can be achieved in developmental studies and whether this depends on the type of task used. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the reliability of three well-classified tasks: an emotional attention, a cognitive control, and an intertemporal choice paradigm. We hypothesized to find higher reliability in the cognitive task than in the emotional or reward-related task. 104 healthy mid-adolescents were scanned at age 14 and again at age 16 within M = 1.8 years using the same paradigms, scanner, and scanning protocols. Overall, we found both variability and stability (i.e. poor to excellent ICCs) depending largely on the region of interest (ROI) and task. Contrary to our hypothesis, whole brain reliability was fair for the cognitive control task but good for the emotional attention and intertemporal choice task. Subcortical ROIs (ventral striatum, amygdala) resulted in lower ICCs than visual ROIs. Current results add to the yet sparse overall ICC literature in both developing samples and adults. This study shows that analyses of stability, i.e. reliability, are helpful benchmarks for longitudinal studies and their implications for adolescent development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.