Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536387›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2016

Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Nanoparticles in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Minnie Au, Theophilus I Emeto, Jacinta Power, Venkat N Vangaveti, Hock C Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. RSC advances · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Polymer nanoparticle-assisted chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Combination Therapies and Drug Delivery Platforms in Combating Pancreatic Cancer.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minnie AuPublic Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, James Cook Drive, Douglas, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia. Minnie.au@my.jcu.edu.au.
Theophilus I EmetoPublic Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, James Cook Drive, Douglas, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia. Theophilus.emeto@jcu.edu.au.
Jacinta PowerTownsville Cancer Centre, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville QLD 4814, Australia. Jacinta.power@my.jcu.edu.au.
Venkat N VangavetiCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, James Cook Drive, Douglas, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia. venkat.vangaveti@jcu.edu.au.
Hock C LaiTownsville Cancer Centre, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville QLD 4814, Australia. Hock.Lai@health.qld.gov.au.
Townsville Hospital · AUJames Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a five year survival rate of less than 5%, which is associated with late presentation. In recent years, research into nanomedicine and the use of nanoparticles as therapeutic agents for cancers has increased. This article describes the latest developments in the use of nanoparticles, and evaluates the risks and benefits of nanoparticles as an emerging therapy for pancreatic cancer. The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used. Studies were extracted by searching the Embase, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 18 March 2016 with no language restrictions. Clinical trials involving the use of nanoparticles as a therapeutic or prognostic option in patients with pancreatic cancer were considered. Selected studies were evaluated using the Jadad score for randomised control trials and the Therapy CA Worksheet for intervention studies. Of the 210 articles found, 10 clinical trials including one randomised control trial and nine phase I/II clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. These studies demonstrated that nanoparticles can be used in conjunction with chemotherapeutic agents increasing their efficacy whilst reducing their toxicity. Increased efficacy of treatment with nanoparticles may improve the clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer, although the long-term side effects are yet to be defined. The study registration number is CRD42015020009.

Indexed as

cancer therapyclinical trialsnanoparticlespancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID28536387
PMCPMC5344258
OpenAlexW2518317305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.