Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28536271›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Contrasting Modulatory Effects from the Dorsal and Ventral Premotor Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex Outputs.

Sandrine L Côté, Adjia Hamadjida, Stephan Quessy, Numa Dancause

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Premotor cortices differentially influence contralateral motor cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandrine L CôtéDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, and.
Adjia HamadjidaDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, and.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-6752
Stephan QuessyDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, and.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-1299
Numa DancauseDépartement de Neurosciences, Faculté de Médecine, and numa.dancause@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0424-9730
Center for Neurosciences · USNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dorsal and ventral premotor cortices (PMd and PMv, respectively) each take part in unique aspects for the planning and execution of hand movements. These premotor areas are components of complex anatomical networks that include the primary motor cortex (M1) of both hemispheres. One way that PMd and PMv could play distinct roles in hand movements is by modulating the outputs of M1 differently. However, patterns of effects from PMd and PMv on the outputs of M1 have not been compared systematically. Our goals were to study how PMd within the same (i.e., ipsilateral or iPMd) and in the opposite hemisphere (i.e., contralateral or cPMd) can shape M1 outputs and then compare these effects with those induced by PMv. We used paired-pulse protocols with intracortical microstimulation techniques in sedated female cebus monkeys while recording EMG signals from intrinsic hand and forearm muscles. A conditioning stimulus was delivered in iPMd or cPMd concurrently or before a test stimulus in M1. The patterns of modulatory effects from PMd were compared with those from PMv collected in the same animals. Striking differences were revealed. Conditioning stimulation in iPMd induced more frequent and powerful inhibitory effects on M1 outputs compared with iPMv. In the opposite hemisphere, cPMd conditioning induced more frequent and powerful facilitatory effects than cPMv. These contrasting patterns of modulatory effects could allow PMd and PMv to play distinct functions for the control of hand movements and predispose them to undertake different, perhaps somewhat opposite, roles in motor recovery after brain injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsCebusExecutive FunctionFemaleHandLong-Term PotentiationMotor CortexMovementNerve NetNeural Pathwayscortexhand movementinteractioninterhemisphericintrahemisphericnetwork

Identifiers

PMID28536271
PMCPMC6596508
OpenAlexW2620017515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.