Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535818›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2017

Rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry of electrosurgical vapours for the identification of breast pathology: towards an intelligent knife for breast cancer surgery.

Edward R St John, Julia Balog, James S McKenzie, Merja Rossi, April Covington, Laura Muirhead, Zsolt Bodai, Francesca Rosini, Abigail V M Speller, Sami Shousha and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07131735 (Intraoperative Detection of Breast Cancer by Electrosurgical Gas Analysis and Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07131735 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Detection of Breast Cancer by Electrosurgical Gas Analysis and Artificial Intelligence

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry in brain cancer diagnosis.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edward R St JohnDepartment of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julia BalogDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
James S McKenzieDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Merja RossiDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
April CovingtonDepartment of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Laura MuirheadDepartment of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Zsolt BodaiDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Francesca RosiniDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abigail V M SpellerDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Sami ShoushaDepartment of Pathology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rathi RamakrishnanDepartment of Pathology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ara DarziDepartment of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Zoltan TakatsDivision of Computational and Systems Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK. z.takats@imperial.ac.uk.
Daniel R LeffDepartment of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, London, UK. d.leff@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBSt. Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRe-operation for positive resection margins following breast-conserving surgery occurs frequently (average = 20-25%), is cost-inefficient, and leads to physical and psychological morbidity. Current margin assessment techniques are slow and labour intensive. Rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS) rapidly identifies dissected tissues by determination of tissue structural lipid profiles through on-line chemical analysis of electrosurgical aerosol toward real-time margin assessment.

methodsElectrosurgical aerosol produced from ex-vivo and in-vivo breast samples was aspirated into a mass spectrometer (MS) using a monopolar hand-piece. Tissue identification results obtained by multivariate statistical analysis of MS data were validated by histopathology. Ex-vivo classification models were constructed from a mass spectral database of normal and tumour breast samples. Univariate and tandem MS analysis of significant peaks was conducted to identify biochemical differences between normal and cancerous tissues. An ex-vivo classification model was used in combination with bespoke recognition software, as an intelligent knife (iKnife), to predict the diagnosis for an ex-vivo validation set. Intraoperative REIMS data were acquired during breast surgery and time-synchronized to operative videos.

resultsA classification model using histologically validated spectral data acquired from 932 sampling points in normal tissue and 226 in tumour tissue provided 93.4% sensitivity and 94.9% specificity. Tandem MS identified 63 phospholipids and 6 triglyceride species responsible for 24 spectral differences between tissue types. iKnife recognition accuracy with 260 newly acquired fresh and frozen breast tissue specimens (normal n = 161, tumour n = 99) provided sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 98.8%. The ex-vivo and intra-operative method produced visually comparable high intensity spectra. iKnife interpretation of intra-operative electrosurgical vapours, including data acquisition and analysis was possible within a mean of 1.80 seconds (SD ±0.40).

conclusionsThe REIMS method has been optimised for real-time iKnife analysis of heterogeneous breast tissues based on subtle changes in lipid metabolism, and the results suggest spectral analysis is both accurate and rapid. Proof-of-concept data demonstrate the iKnife method is capable of online intraoperative data collection and analysis. Further validation studies are required to determine the accuracy of intra-operative REIMS for oncological margin assessment.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsElectrosurgeryFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationBreastCanceriKnifeIntelligent knifeIntraoperative margin assessmentMarginsMass spectrometryRapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometryREIMSSurgery

Identifiers

PMID28535818
PMCPMC5442854
OpenAlexW2617752143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.