Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535804›Full record

ReviewHarm reduction journal2017

Housing First and harm reduction: a rapid review and document analysis of the US and Canadian open-access literature.

Dennis P Watson, Valery Shuman, James Kowalsky, Elizabeth Golembiewski, Molly Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Harm reduction journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis P WatsonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. dpwatson@iu.edu.
Valery ShumanHeartland Health Outreach, Midwest Harm Reduction Institute, 1207 W. Leland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60640, USA.
James KowalskyHeartland Health Outreach, Midwest Harm Reduction Institute, 1207 W. Leland Ave., Chicago, IL, 60640, USA.
Elizabeth GolembiewskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Molly BrownDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, 2219 N. Kenmore Ave., Chicago, IL, 60614, USA.

Funding

Pilot Testing of an E-Learning Strategy for Housing First ImplementationR34DA036001 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WATSON, DENNIS PAUL · 2014 to 2016
$633k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA036001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousing First is an evidence-based practice intended to serve chronically homeless individuals with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorders. Despite housing active substance users, harm reduction is an often-overlooked element during the Housing First implementation process in real-world settings. In this paper, we explore the representation of the Housing First model within the open-access scholarly literature as a potential contributing factor for this oversight.

methodsWe conducted a rapid review of the US and Canadian open-access Housing First literature. We followed a document analysis approach, to form an interpretation of the articles' content related to our primary research questions.

resultsA total of 55 articles on Housing First were included in the final analysis. Only 21 of these articles (38.1%) included explicit mention of harm reduction. Of the 34 articles that did not discuss harm reduction, 22 provided a description of the Housing First model indicating it does not require abstinence from substance use; however, descriptions did not all clearly indicate abstinence was not required beyond program entry. Additional Housing First descriptions focused on the low-barrier entry criteria and/or the intervention's client-centeredness.

conclusionsOur review demonstrated a lack of both explicit mention and informed discussion of harm reduction in the Housing First literature, which is likely contributing to the Housing First research-practice gap to some degree. Future Housing First literature should accurately explain the role of harm reduction when discussing it in the context of Housing First programming, and public agencies promoting Housing First uptake should provide resources for proper implementation and monitor program fidelity to prevent model drift.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionAccess to InformationCanadaDocumentationDrug UsersHousingHumansIll-Housed PersonsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesDocument analysisDrug useFidelityHarm reductionHousingHousing FirstImplementationRapid reviewSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID28535804
PMCPMC5442650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.