Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535583›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology and translational medicine2017

Molecular Testing of Brain Tumor.

Sung-Hye Park, Jaekyung Won, Seong-Ik Kim, Yujin Lee, Chul-Kee Park, Seung-Ki Kim, Seung-Hong Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diagnostic challenges in complicated case of glioblastoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A comprehensive overview on the molecular biology of human glioma: what the clinician needs to know.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jaekyung WonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong-Ik KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yujin LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Ki KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors was revised in 2016 with a basis on the integrated diagnosis of molecular genetics. We herein provide the guidelines for using molecular genetic tests in routine pathological practice for an accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. While astrocytomas and IDH-mutant (secondary) glioblastomas are characterized by the mutational status of

Indexed as

Brain neoplasmsMolecular biologyNext generation sequencingPathological diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID28535583
PMCPMC5445205
OpenAlexW2612175024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.