Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535271›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

Measuring Trachomatous Inflammation-Intense (TI) When Prevalence Is Low Provides Data on Infection With Chlamydia trachomatis.

Andrea I Zambrano, Beatriz E Muñoz, Harran Mkocha, Laura Dize, Charlotte A Gaydos, Thomas Quinn, Sheila K West

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active women in VenezuelaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea I ZambranoDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Beatriz E MuñozDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Harran MkochaKongwa Trachoma Project, Kongwa, Tanzania.
Laura DizeInternational Chlamydia Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Charlotte A GaydosInternational Chlamydia Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Thomas QuinnInternational Chlamydia Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States 4National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Sheila K WestDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Funding

Immunopathogenesis Of Chlamydia trachomatis InfectionZIAAI000358 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI QUINN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$7.0M
Surveillance & Treatment of Community Newcomers & Travelers for Trachoma ControlU10EY022584 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WEST, SHEILA K · 2012 to 2015
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY022584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical trachoma is the current measure of effectiveness of antibiotic and environmental improvements in trachoma endemic communities. Impact assessments measure only trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF). Trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI) is not used for decisions on stopping mass drug administration (MDA) or achieving intervention goals. We tested the supposition that TI was not associated with Chlamydia trachomatis when disease prevalence is low. Methods: In 35 communities undergoing MDA as part of a larger project, 110 children ages 1 to 9 years were randomly selected in each community for surveys at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Both eyelids were graded for TF and TI, and a swab for detection of C. trachomatis infection was taken. Results: Overall TF prevalence was 5% at baseline. Cases of TI alone constituted 15% of trachoma; 37% of TI cases had infection. At 6 and 12 months, the proportion of trachoma cases that had TI only was 13% and 20%; infection rates were similar to the rates in cases with TF alone. Conclusions: Despite low prevalence of trachoma, infection rates for TF alone and TI alone were similar at each time point. The exclusion of cases of TI alone when reporting trachoma prevalence discards additional information on infection. Trachomatous inflammation-intense could be considered as part of impact surveys.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisEye Infections, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInflammationMalePrevalenceRisk AssessmentTanzaniaTime FactorsTrachomaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28535271
PMCPMC5308676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.