Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535263›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Gene expression variability and the analysis of large-scale RNA-seq studies with the MDSeq.

Di Ran, Z John Daye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SIEVEseq: unified differential expression, variability, and skewness analyses using RNA-Seq data.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Di RanMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Z John DayeIndependent Researcher, Raleigh, NC 27612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly decreasing cost of next-generation sequencing has led to the recent availability of large-scale RNA-seq data, that empowers the analysis of gene expression variability, in addition to gene expression means. In this paper, we present the MDSeq, based on the coefficient of dispersion, to provide robust and computationally efficient analysis of both gene expression means and variability on RNA-seq counts. The MDSeq utilizes a novel reparametrization of the negative binomial to provide flexible generalized linear models (GLMs) on both the mean and dispersion. We address challenges of analyzing large-scale RNA-seq data via several new developments to provide a comprehensive toolset that models technical excess zeros, identifies outliers efficiently, and evaluates differential expressions at biologically interesting levels. We evaluated performances of the MDSeq using simulated data when the ground truths are known. Results suggest that the MDSeq often outperforms current methods for the analysis of gene expression mean and variability. Moreover, the MDSeq is applied in two real RNA-seq studies, in which we identified functionally relevant genes and gene pathways. Specifically, the analysis of gene expression variability with the MDSeq on the GTEx human brain tissue data has identified pathways associated with common neurodegenerative disorders when gene expression means were conserved.

Indexed as

SoftwareCerebellumCerebral CortexGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLinear ModelsRNASequence Analysis, RNASkinSunlightRNA

Identifiers

PMID28535263
PMCPMC5737414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.