Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535154›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2017

Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer.

Teresa E Brown, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Judith D Bauer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06219083 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Study of Nutritional Status and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Common Malignancies

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorXiaoqin LuoRan2020 to 2031Enrolled1,538ConditionsCancer, Chemoradiotherapy, Nutrition, Healthy, Oncology
NCT07087561 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effects and Mechanisms of Short-Term Nutritional Enhancement Combined With Health Education on Clinical Outcomes in Postoperative Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiaoqin LuoRan2024 to 2030Enrolled360ConditionsColorectal Cancer (Diagnosis), Malnutrition or Risk of MalnutritionArmsPersonalized Oral Nutritional Supplementation, Personalized Parenteral Nutritional Supplementation, Structured Nutrition-Focused Health Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Malnutrition and radiation therapy in head and neck cancers, a systematic review on reported definitions and associated factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The changing face of head and neck cancer: are patients with human papillomavirus-positive disease at greater nutritional risk? A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa E BrownCentre for Dietetics Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Merrilyn D BanksDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia.
Brett G M HughesCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia.
Charles Y LinCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia.
Lizbeth M KennyCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane QLD 4029, Australia.
Judith D BauerCentre for Dietetics Research (C-DIET-R), School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight loss remains significant in patients with head and neck cancer, despite prophylactic gastrostomy and intensive dietary counseling. The aim of this study was to improve outcomes utilising an early nutrition intervention.

methodsPatients with head and neck cancer at a tertiary hospital in Australia referred for prophylactic gastrostomy prior to curative intent treatment were eligible for this single centre randomised controlled trial. Exclusions included severe malnutrition or dysphagia. Patients were assigned following computer-generated randomisation sequence with allocation concealment to either intervention or standard care. The intervention group commenced supplementary tube feeding immediately following tube placement. Primary outcome measure was percentage weight loss at three months post treatment.

resultsRecruitment completed June 2015 with 70 patients randomised to standard care (66 complete cases) and 61 to intervention (56 complete cases). Following intention-to-treat analysis, linear regression found no effect of the intervention on weight loss (10.9±6.6% standard care vs 10.8±5.6% intervention, P=0.930) and this remained non-significant on multivariable analysis (P=0.624). No other differences were found for quality of life or clinical outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThe early intervention did not improve outcomes, but poor adherence to nutrition recommendations impacted on potential outcomes.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresWeight LossAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAustraliaCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCisplatinEnteral NutritionFemaleGastrostomyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabCisplatin

Identifiers

PMID28535154
PMCPMC5520203
OpenAlexW2619975858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.