Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28535143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2017

Intercultural communication through the eyes of patients: experiences and preferences.

Emma Paternotte, Sandra van Dulmen, Lindsay Bank, Conny Seeleman, Albert Scherpbier, Fedde Scheele

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma PaternotteDepartment of Healthcare Education, OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lindsay BankDepartment of Healthcare Education, OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Conny SeelemanJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Albert ScherpbierInstitute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Fedde ScheeleDepartment of Healthcare Education, OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patients' preferences and experiences regarding intercultural communication which could influence the development of intercultural patient-centred communication training.

methodsThis qualitative study is based on interviews with non-native patients. Thirty non-native patients were interviewed between September and December 2015 about their preferences and experiences regarding communication with a native Dutch doctor. Fourteen interviews were established with an interpreter. The semi-structured interviews took place in Amsterdam. They were focused on generic and intercultural communication skills of doctors. Relevant fragments were coded by two researchers and analysed by the research team by means of thematic network analysis. Informed consent and ethical approval was obtained beforehand.

resultsAll patients preferred a doctor with a professional patient-centred attitude regardless of the doctor's background. Patients mentioned mainly generic communication aspects, such as listening, as important skills and seemed to be aware of their own responsibility in participating in a consultation. Being treated as a unique person and not as a disease was also frequently mentioned. Unfamiliarity with the Dutch healthcare system influenced the experienced communication negatively. However, a language barrier was considered the most important problem, which would become less pressing once a doctor-patient relation was established.

conclusionsRemarkably, patients in this study had no preference regarding the ethnic background of the doctor. Generic communication was experienced as important as specific intercultural communication, which underlines the marginal distinction between these two. A close link between intercultural communication and patient-centred communication was reflected in the expressed preference 'to be treated as a person'.

Indexed as

CommunicationCultural CompetencyPhysician-Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunication BarriersDelivery of Health CareEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsPatient-Centered CarePatient PreferencePhysiciansintercultural communicationinterviewspatient-centred communicationpatient participationpatient perspectivesthe netherlands

Identifiers

PMID28535143
PMCPMC5457791
OpenAlexW2618288980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.