ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017
MicroRNA‑141 inhibits the self‑renewal of glioblastoma stem cells via Jagged1.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential role of microRNAs as biomarkers in human glioblastoma: a mini systematic review from 2015 to 2020.Molecular biology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Tumor heterogeneity and resistance in glioblastoma: the role of stem cells.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNAs and glioma: Focus on cancer stem cells.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2022Review
- Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as new tools for delivery of miRNAs in the treatment of cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- MicroRNAs at the Crossroad of the Dichotomic Pathway Cell Death vs. Stemness in Neural Somatic and Cancer Stem Cells: Implications and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Noncoding RNAs: the shot callers in tumor immune escape.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020Review
- Review
- Aberrant miRNAs Regulate the Biological Hallmarks of Glioblastoma.Neuromolecular medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme is one of the most lethal types of brain cancer. With limited success from conventional therapies, the cancer stem cell theory was developed, and investigation into microRNAs (miRs) has facilitated understanding of this theory. The present study demonstrated that miR‑141 is suppressed in sorted cluster of differentiation (CD) 133(+) glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) compared with CD133(‑) non‑glioblastoma stem cells (NSCs) from patient samples. In addition, miR‑141 overexpression inhibited the sphere formation ability of GSCs in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, Jagged1 may reverse the effect of miR‑141; miR‑141 was revealed to target the 3'‑untranslated region of Jagged1, thereby inhibiting the stemness of GSCs. Thus, miR‑141 may serve as a potent antioncomir targeting cancer stem cells, and may facilitate the development of therapeutic targets to prolong the overall survival of patients with glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.