Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28534953›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017

Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in kidneys of brain dead rabbits.

Ling Li, Ning Li, Chongxiang He, Wei Huang, Xiaoli Fan, Zibiao Zhong, Yanfeng Wang, Qifa Ye

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ling LiInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Ning LiInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Chongxiang HeInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Wei HuangInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Xiaoli FanInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Zibiao ZhongInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Yanfeng WangInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Qifa YeInstitute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of previous clinical studies have reported a delayed graft function for brain dead donors, when compared with living relatives or cadaveric organ transplantations. However, there is no accurate method for the quality evaluation of kidneys from brain‑dead donors. In the present study, two‑dimensional gel electrophoresis and MALDI‑TOF MS‑based comparative proteomic analysis were conducted to profile the differentially‑expressed proteins between brain death and the control group renal tissues. A total of 40 age‑ and sex‑matched rabbits were randomly divided into donation following brain death (DBD) and control groups. Following the induction of brain death via intracranial progressive pressure, the renal function and the morphological alterations were measured 2, 6 and 8 h afterwards. The differentially expressed proteins were detected from renal histological evidence at 6 h following brain death. Although 904±19 protein spots in control groups and 916±25 in DBD groups were identified in the two‑dimensional gel electrophoresis, >2‑fold alterations were identified by MALDI‑TOF MS and searched by NCBI database. The authors successfully acquired five downregulated proteins, these were: Prohibitin (isoform CRA_b), beta-1,3‑N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1, Annexin A5, superoxide dismutase (mitochondrial) and cytochrome b‑c1 complex subunit 1 (mitochondrial precursor). Conversely, the other five upregulated proteins were: PRP38 pre‑mRNA processing factor 38 (yeast) domain containing A, calcineurin subunit B type 1, V‑type proton ATPase subunit G 1, NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 10 and peroxiredoxin‑3 (mitochondrial). Immunohistochemical results revealed that the expressions of prohibitin (PHB) were gradually increased in a time‑dependent manner. The results indicated that there were alterations in levels of several proteins in the kidneys of those with brain death, even if the primary function and the morphological changes were not obvious. PHB may therefore be a novel biomarker for primary quality evaluation of kidneys from brain‑dead donors.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkersBrain DeathDisease Models, AnimalImmunohistochemistryKidneyKidney Function TestsMaleRabbitsSignal TransductionBiomarkersProteome

Identifiers

PMID28534953
PMCPMC5482134
OpenAlexW2616200518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.