Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28534239›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2017

Analysis of Screening Electrocardiogram for the Subcutaneous Defibrillator in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Vincent C Thomas, Mark Peterson, Martin McDaniel, Humberto Restrepo, Abraham Rothman, Amit Jain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent C ThomasUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 8200 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE, 68164, USA. vthomas@childrensomaha.org.
Mark PetersonBoston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Martin McDanielBoston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Humberto RestrepoChildren's Heart Center Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Abraham RothmanChildren's Heart Center Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Amit JainUniversity of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA.
Boston Scientific (United States) · USChildren's Heart Center Nevada · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidates for the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) are screened using an electrocardiogram (S-ECG) tool to measure appropriate detection. We sought to define the S-ICD candidacy of congenital heart disease patients using the S-ECG tool. We also analyzed the reliability of the (S-ECG) tool between measurers in this population. Patients above the age of 12 and with a diagnosis associated with either a higher incidence of cardiac arrest or vascular access challenges were asked to undergo screening. S-ECGs were then analyzed by a pediatric electrophysiologist, an S-ICD device engineer, and an S-ICD clinical representative for candidacy. Results were compared for interobserver variability and S-ECGs were analyzed by t test to determine variables that differ among passing and failing leads. Thirty-one patients underwent screening. Two of the 31 (6.5%) patients failed S-ICD screening. Analysis of the screening leads demonstrated the highest passing rates using lead III at a 5 mm/mV amplitude setting with 71 and 62% pass rate in the supine and standing positions, respectively. Interobserver analysis correlated well among the three measurers. There was a higher amplitude difference between QRS and T waves among passing versus failing S-ECG. Congenital heart disease patients have acceptable passage rates utilizing the S-ECG algorithm. Interobserver measurements were well correlated and these data suggest that the proximal coil to device (lead III) vector would be best utilized in this patient population. A larger difference between QRS and T wave amplitudes was associated with a higher S-ECG passing rate.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiographyAdultArrhythmias, CardiacDeath, Sudden, CardiacElectric CountershockFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient SelectionReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsYoung AdultCongenital heart diseaseScreeningSubcutaneous defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID28534239
OpenAlexW2617007978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.