Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28534235›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2017

Nasal high flow in management of children with status asthmaticus: a retrospective observational study.

Florent Baudin, Alexandra Buisson, Blandine Vanel, Bruno Massenavette, Robin Pouyau, Etienne Javouhey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03091504 (Evaluation on the Efficacy of Bronchodilator Nebulization Via High Flow Nasal Cannula), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03091504 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation on the Efficacy of Bronchodilator Nebulization Via High Flow Nasal Cannula

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2018Enrolled42ConditionsHigh Flow Nasal CannulaArmsHigh flow nasal cannula, Albuterol Sulfate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nasal High-flow Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Acute Severe Asthma Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Management of Children with Acute Asthma Attack: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Florent BaudinRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France. florent.baudin@chu-lyon.fr.
Alexandra BuissonRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Blandine VanelRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Bruno MassenavetteRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Robin PouyauRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Etienne JavouheyRéanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, Bron, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is the most common obstructive airway disease in children and adults. Nasal high flow (NHF) is a recent device that is now used as a primary support for respiratory distress. Several studies have reported use of NHF as a respiratory support in status asthmaticus; however, there are no data to recommend such practice. We therefore conducted this preliminary study to evaluate NHF therapy for children with status asthmaticus admitted to our PICU in order to prepare a multicentre randomized controlled study.

resultsBetween November 2009 and January 2014, 73 patients with status asthmaticus were admitted to the PICU, of whom 39 (53%) were treated with NHF and among these 10 (26%) presented severe acidosis at admission (pH < 7.30). Thirty-four less severe children (41%) were treated with standard oxygen. For one child (2.6%) NHF failed and was then switched to non-invasive ventilation. NHF was discontinued in another patient because of the occurrence of pneumothorax after 31 h with NHF; the patient was then switched to standard oxygen therapy. Mean ± SD heart rate (165 ± 21 vs. 141 ± 25/min, p < 0.01) and respiratory rate (40 ± 13 vs. 31 ± 8/min, p < 0.01) decreased significantly, and blood gas improved in the first 24 h. In the subgroup of patients with acidosis, median [IQR] pH increased significantly between hour 0 and 2 (7.25 [7.21-7.26] vs. 7.30 [7.27-7.33], p = 0.009) and median [IQR] pCO

conclusionThis retrospective study showed the feasibility and safety of NHF in children with severe asthma. Blood gas and clinical parameters were significantly improved during the first 24 h. NHF failed in only two patients, and none required invasive ventilation.

Indexed as

AsthmaChildrenHigh-flow nasal cannulaNon-invasive ventilationPaediatric intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID28534235
PMCPMC5440424
OpenAlexW2619720895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.