ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: how can we improve outcome?
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of perform enterectomy in colorectal cancer patients aged 80 or older. A meta-analysis and a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Uncovering the mechanism of DCLK3 in colorectal cancer progression through WGCNA and machine learning.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of age on short-term outcomes and oncologic prognosis after radical surgery for colorectal cancer over 60.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- An internally and externally validated nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in octogenarians after radical resection for colorectal cancer.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Article
- Outcomes in octogenarians following elective colorectal cancer surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in node negative colorectal cancer with or without perineural invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Octogenarian patients with colon cancer - postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients 80 years and older: a comparison with younger age groups.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Short and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary anastomosis for cancer.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Article
- Risk factors of short-term survival in the aged in elective colon cancer surgery: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Long-Term Survival in Octogenarians After Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer: Prevention of Postoperative Complications is Key.Annals of surgical oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients over 70 years of age are characterised by diminished long-term survival rates following resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to younger patients. The aim of this study was to clarify whether reduced survival is a result of malignancy, comorbidities or the treatment received.
methodsAll patients with CRC, who were admitted to our institution over a period of 10 years, were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Disease-specific, disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated dependent on variables considered potentially relevant for the patients' prognosis.
results915 patients were included in the study. Observed 5- and 10-year survival rates for the whole group were 48 ± 2% and 40 ± 2%, respectively, but 10-year survival rates dropped to 14 ± 4% for patients aged 80 and older. Resection of the primary tumour was attempted in all cases independent of age. Emergency admission, Charlson index ≥2, ECOG ≥2, old age, second malignancies, distant metastases, high grading and non-resective surgery were identified as independent prognostic parameters associated with decreased overall survival. In contrast, disease-specific and disease-free survival rates for patients after elective radical resection in UICC-stage I-III did not show significant differences related to age. Tumour site, UICC-stage and resection status were independent statistically significant predictors of disease-specific survival.
conclusionsSimilar disease-specific survival rates in all age groups speak in favour of tumour resection in curative intent even in old patients. Better outcome may be achieved, if regular screening for colorectal cancer is considered even in the elderly to avoid late presentation requiring emergency surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.