Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28534105›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2017

Bacterial diversity of cosmopolitan Culex pipiens and invasive Aedes japonicus from Germany.

Sina Zotzmann, Antje Steinbrink, Kathrin Schleich, Felix Frantzmann, Chinhda Xoumpholphakdy, Manuela Spaeth, Claire Valiente Moro, Patrick Mavingui, Sven Klimpel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insects · 2025
    Article
  6. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sina ZotzmannInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany. s.zotzmann@web.de.
Antje SteinbrinkInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Kathrin SchleichInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Felix FrantzmannInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Chinhda XoumpholphakdyInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Manuela SpaethInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Claire Valiente MoroEcologie Microbienne, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Bat. André Lwoff, 10 Rue Raphaël Dubois, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Patrick MavinguiEcologie Microbienne, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Bat. André Lwoff, 10 Rue Raphaël Dubois, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.
Sven KlimpelInstitute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe-University (GU); Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F); Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438, Frankfurt/M., Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic bacteria have gained significant attention in recent years. For example, microbiota of some mosquito species seems to influence the development and transmission of pathogens. Furthermore, several attempts using bacteria as a paratransgenetic tool have been made in order to assist the control of mosquito-borne diseases. In this study, we examined the bacterial diversity of wild-caught adult Culex (Cx.) pipiens and laboratory-reared adult Aedes japonicus (Ae. japonicus) in Germany using a culture-independent method. Genomic DNA was extracted from each specimen and submitted to PCR amplification of eubacterial 16S rDNA. After the cloning reaction, 28 bacterial transformants per sample containing the 16S rDNA inserts were selected per each sample for sequencing. The analysed specimens of Cx. pipiens as well as of Ae. japonicus showed a diverse bacterial community including some common bacterial genera. Blast analysis allowed to identify 21 bacterial genera belonging to 2 phyla among the 23 specimens of Cx. pipiens. The 14 analysed Ae. japonicus revealed 11 bacterial genera belonging to 3 phyla. In both mosquito species, identified isolates were mainly Proteobacteria. Only 4 of the bacterial genera were found in both mosquito species, with the most prevalent genera Sphingomonas and Rahnella in Cx. pipiens and in Ae. japonicus respectively. Most of the bacterial genera found in our study have been identified in other mosquito species before. Due to the currently scarce data situation, ongoing examinations on the very abundant bacterial genera or species are strongly required to determine their relevance for the biology and adaptiveness of mosquitoes including pathogen-host relationship.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAedesAnimalsBacteriaCulexDNA, RibosomalFemaleGermanyDNA, RibosomalAedes japonicusBacterial diversityCloningCulex pipiens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.