Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28534028›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2017

Mechanisms Affecting the Gut of Preterm Infants in Enteral Feeding Trials.

Nicholas D Embleton, Janet E Berrington, Jon Dorling, Andrew K Ewer, Edmund Juszczak, John A Kirby, Christopher A Lamb, Clare V Lanyon, William McGuire, Christopher S Probert and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Early full enteral feeding for preterm or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas D EmbletonNewcastle Neonatal Service, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Janet E BerringtonNewcastle Neonatal Service, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jon DorlingSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew K EwerCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK.
Edmund JuszczakClinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John A KirbyInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Christopher A LambInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare V LanyonDepartment for Biomedical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
William McGuireCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Christopher S ProbertDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen P RushtonSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mark D ShirleySchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Christopher J StewartDepartment for Biomedical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stephen P CummingsSchool of Science and Engineering, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Newcastle University · GBBaylor College of Medicine · USNorthumbria University · GBTeesside University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health EME/13/122/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in preterm infants offer unique opportunities for mechanistic evaluation of the risk factors leading to serious diseases, as well as the actions of interventions designed to prevent them. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) a serious inflammatory gut condition and late-onset sepsis (LOS) are common feeding and nutrition-related problems that may cause death or serious long-term morbidity and are key outcomes in two current UK National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR) trials. Speed of increasing milk feeds trial (SIFT) randomized preterm infants to different rates of increases in milk feeds with a primary outcome of survival without disability at 2 years corrected age. Enteral lactoferrin in neonates (ELFIN) randomizes infants to supplemental enteral lactoferrin or placebo with a primary outcome of LOS. This is a protocol for the mechanisms affecting the gut of preterm infants in enteral feeding trials (MAGPIE) study and is funded by the UK NIHR Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation programme. MAGPIE will recruit ~480 preterm infants who were enrolled in SIFT or ELFIN. Participation in MAGPIE does not change the main trial protocols and uses non-invasive sampling of stool and urine, along with any residual resected gut tissue if infants required surgery. Trial interventions may involve effects on gut microbes, metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids), and aspects of host immune function. Current hypotheses suggest that NEC and/or LOS are due to a dysregulated immune system in the context of gut dysbiosis, but mechanisms have not been systematically studied within large RCTs. Microbiomic analysis will use next-generation sequencing, and metabolites will be assessed by mass spectrometry to detect volatile organic and other compounds produced by microbes or the host. We will explore differences between disease cases and controls, as well as exploring the actions of trial interventions. Impacts of this research are multiple: translation of knowledge of mechanisms promoting gut health may explain outcomes or suggest alternate strategies to improve health. Results may identify new non-invasive diagnostic or monitoring techniques, preventative or treatment strategies for NEC or LOS, or provide data useful for risk stratification in future studies. Mechanistic evaluation might be especially informative where there are not clear effects on the primary outcome (ISRCTN 12554594).

Indexed as

gut microbiotalactoferrinlate-onset sepsismechanistic evaluationmetabolomenecrotizing enterocolitisnutritionpreterm infant

Identifiers

PMID28534028
PMCPMC5420562
OpenAlexW2612332169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.