Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533938›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Radionuclide bone scan SPECT-CT: lowering the dose of CT significantly reduces radiation dose without impacting CT image quality.

Sandeep Kumar Gupta, Scott Trethewey, Bree Brooker, Natalie Rutherford, Jenny Diffey, Suresh Viswanathan, John Attia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandeep Kumar GuptaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter and Calvary Mater Hospitals, Conjoint Lecturer-University of NewcastleNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
Scott TretheweyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter and Calvary Mater HospitalsNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
Bree BrookerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter and Calvary Mater HospitalsNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
Natalie RutherfordDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter and Calvary Mater Hospitals, Conjoint Lecturer-University of NewcastleNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
Jenny DiffeyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter and Calvary Mater Hospitals, Conjoint Lecturer-University of NewcastleNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
Suresh ViswanathanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET, John Hunter, Calvary Mater and Tamworth Base HospitalsNewcastle, NSW, Australia.
John AttiaDepartment of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Professor-School of Medicine and Public Health-University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research InstituteNewcastle, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CT component of SPECT-CT is required for attenuation correction and anatomical localization of the uptake on SPECT but there is no guideline about the optimal CT acquisition parameters. In our department, a standard CT acquisition protocol was changed in 2013 to give lower radiation dose to the patient. In this study, we retrospectively compared the effects on patient dose as well as the CT image quality with current versus older CT protocols. Ninety nine consecutive patients [n=51 Standard dose 'old' protocol (SDP); n=48 lower dose 'new' protocol (LDP)] with lumbar spine SPECT-CT for bone scan were examined. The main differences between the two protocols were that SDP used 130 kVp tube voltage and reference current-time product of 70 mAs whereas the LDP used 110 kVp and 40 mAs respectively. Various quantitative parameters from the CT images were obtained and the images were also rated blindly by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians for bony definition and noise. The mean calculated dose length product of the LDP group (121.5±39.6 mGy.cm) was significantly lower compared to the SDP group patients (266.9±96.9 mGy.cm; P<0.0001). This translated into a significant reduction in the mean effective dose to 1.8 mSv from 4.0 mSv. The physicians reported better CT image quality for the bony structures in LDP group although for soft tissue structures, the SDP group had better image quality. The optimized new CT acquisition protocol significantly reduced the radiation dose to the patient and in-fact improved CT image quality for the assessment of bony structures.

Indexed as

CTDLPkVplow dosemAsSPECT

Identifiers

PMID28533938
PMCPMC5435612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.