Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533819›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2017

The optimal crowd learning machine.

Bilguunzaya Battogtokh, Majid Mojirsheibani, James Malley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bilguunzaya BattogtokhCenter for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8611-3804
Majid MojirsheibaniDepartment of Mathematics, California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA USA.
James MalleyCenter for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.

Funding

Statistical Learning for Biomedical DataZIACT000271 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI MALLEY, JAMES D · 2009 to 2017
$1.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAny family of learning machines can be combined into a single learning machine using various methods with myriad degrees of usefulness.

resultsFor making predictions on an outcome, it is provably at least as good as the best machine in the family, given sufficient data. And if one machine in the family minimizes the probability of misclassification, in the limit of large data, then Optimal Crowd does also. That is, the Optimal Crowd is asymptotically Bayes optimal if any machine in the crowd is such.

conclusionsThe only assumption needed for proving optimality is that the outcome variable is bounded. The scheme is illustrated using real-world data from the UCI machine learning site, and possible extensions are proposed.

Identifiers

PMID28533819
PMCPMC5437584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.