Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533774›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2017

The Role of IFN-β during the Course of Sepsis Progression and Its Therapeutic Potential.

Gorjana Rackov, Rahman Shokri, Melchor Álvarez De Mon, Carlos Martínez-A, Dimitrios Balomenos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interferon-β Activity Is Affected by S100B Protein.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. STING1 in sepsis: Mechanisms, functions, and implications.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gorjana RackovDepartment of Immunology and Oncology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología - CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Rahman ShokriDepartment of Immunology and Oncology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología - CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Melchor Álvarez De MonImmune System Diseases-Rheumatology and Oncology Service, University Hospital Principe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Carlos Martínez-ADepartment of Immunology and Oncology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología - CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Dimitrios BalomenosDepartment of Immunology and Oncology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología - CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESHospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias · ESIMDEA Nanoscience · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a complex biphasic syndrome characterized by both pro- and anti-inflammatory immune states. Whereas early sepsis mortality is caused by an acute, deleterious pro-inflammatory response, the second sepsis phase is governed by acute immunosuppression, which predisposes patients to long-term risk for life-threatening secondary infections. Despite extensive basic research and clinical trials, there is to date no specific therapy for sepsis, and mortality rates are on the rise. Although IFN-β is one of the most-studied cytokines, its diverse effects are not fully understood. Depending on the disease or type of infection, it can have beneficial or detrimental effects. As IFN-β has been used successfully to treat diverse diseases, emphasis has been placed on understanding the role of IFN-β in sepsis. Analyses of mouse models of septic shock attribute a pro-inflammatory role to IFN-β in sepsis development. As anti-inflammatory treatments in humans with antibodies to TNF-α or IL1-β resulted disappointing, cytokine modulation approaches were discouraged and neutralization of IFN-β has not been pursued for sepsis treatment. In the case of patients with delayed sepsis and immunosuppression, there is a debate as to whether the use of specific cytokines would restore the deactivated immune response. Recent reports show an association of low IFN-β levels with the hyporesponsive state of monocytes from sepsis patients and after endotoxin tolerance induction. These data, discussed here, project a role for IFN-β in restoring monocyte function and reversing immunosuppression, and suggest IFN-β-based additive immunomodulatory therapy. The dichotomy in putative therapeutic approaches, involving reduction or an increase in IFN-β levels, mirrors the contrasting nature of the early hyperinflammatory state and the delayed immunosuppression phase.

Indexed as

IFNIFN-βimmunosuppressionM1–M2 polarizationmacrophagesmonocytesp21sepsis

Identifiers

PMID28533774
PMCPMC5420561
OpenAlexW2613293281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.