Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533573›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2017

Comparison of Early Results and Complications between Multi-and Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Ahmed Mohammed Ali Hussein Al-Hurry, Hajar Khazraei, Fatemeh Ganji, Fatemeh Sadeghi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Adiponectin and leptin levels of patients after sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass surgeries.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyed Vahid HosseiniColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Ali HosseiniColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ahmed Mohammed Ali Hussein Al-HurryDepartment of Surgery, Najaf University of Medical Sciences, Kerbala, Iraq.
Hajar KhazraeiColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh GanjiColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh SadeghiDepartment of Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become more acceptable for obese patients. Single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) is more popular since each abdominal incision carries the risk of bleeding, hernia, and internal organ injury as well as exponentially affecting cosmesis. This cross-sectional study aimed at comparing multi-port sleeve gastrectomy (MPSG) and SPSG in terms of their early results and complications.

methodsOut of129 obese patients candidated for LSG, 102 patients were assigned to 2 groups of SPSG and MPSG. Complications and demographic data such as body mass index (BMI), age, gender, operation time, and hospital stay were measured. All surgeries were carried out between2013 and 2015 in Shiraz, Iran. Data analysis was performed using SPSS, version 16 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Student

resultsThe patients' data from both groups were similar in terms of age, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, and length of hospital stay. Mean BMI was 42.8±0.7 in the SPSG group and 45.3±1.2 in the MPSG group. Duration of surgery was significantly lower in the SPSG group (P<0.001). Only 1 patient from the SPSG group and 5 patients from the MPSG group had bleeding as an early complication.

conclusionThe differences in each complication between the groups were not statistically significant. SPSG seems to be safe and is the same as MPSG in terms of major postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT201512229936N12 The abstract was presented in the 4

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryComplicationsGastrectomySingle port

Identifiers

PMID28533573
PMCPMC5429493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.