Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533463›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy.

Elizabeth A Tibbetts, Sean P Mullen, James Dale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cryptic Ontogenetic Changes in the Ventral Coloration of a Color Polymorphic Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis).Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Origins of music in credible signaling.The Behavioral and brain sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Complex signals alter recognition accuracy and conspecific acceptance thresholds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The current and future state of animal coloration research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. The effect of social environment on bird song: listener-specific expression of a sexual signal.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth A TibbettsEcology and Evolution, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA tibbetts@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-892X
Sean P MullenDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
James DaleInstitute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5950-5829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal coloration is influenced by selection pressures associated with communication. During communication, signallers display traits that inform receivers and modify receiver behaviour in ways that benefit signallers. Here, we discuss how selection on signallers to convey different kinds of information influences animal phenotypes and genotypes. Specifically, we address the phenotypic and genetic consequences of communicating three different kinds of information: individual identity, behavioural strategy and quality. Previous work has shown signals that convey different kinds of information differ in terms of the (i) type of selection acting on signallers (e.g. directional, stabilizing, or negative frequency dependent), and (ii) developmental basis of signals (i.e. heritability, genetic architecture). These differences result in signals that convey different information having consistently different phenotypic properties, including the amount, modality and continuity of intraspecific variation. Understanding how communication influences animal phenotypes may allow researchers to quickly identify putative functions of colour variation prior to experimentation. Signals that convey different information will also have divergent evolutionary consequences. For example, signalling individual identity can increase genetic diversity, signalling quality may decrease diversity, and signalling strategy can constrain adaptation and contribute to speciation. Considering recent advances in genomic resources, our framework highlights new opportunities to resolve the evolutionary consequences of selection on communication across diverse taxa and signal types.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationColorGenetic VariationPhenotypeAnimalsBiological EvolutionInvertebratesVertebratescolour polymorphismcommunicationindividual recognitionornamentssexual selection

Identifiers

PMID28533463
PMCPMC5444067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.