Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533456›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Mary Caswell Stoddard, Mark E Hauber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Ant behaviour and brain gene expression of defending hosts depend on the ecological success of the intruding social parasite.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Living Light 2018: Conference Report.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  18. The current and future state of animal coloration research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Caswell StoddardDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA mstoddard@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-3170
Mark E HauberDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College and Graduate Center of the City University of New York, NY, USA.
Princeton University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coevolutionary interactions between avian brood parasites and their hosts provide a powerful system for investigating the diversity of animal coloration. Specifically, reciprocal selection pressure applied by hosts and brood parasites can give rise to novel forms and functions of animal coloration, which largely differ from those that arise when selection is imposed by predators or mates. In the study of animal colours, avian brood parasite-host dynamics therefore invite special consideration. Rapid advances across disciplines have paved the way for an integrative study of colour and vision in brood parasite-host systems. We now know that visually driven host defences and host life history have selected for a suite of phenotypic adaptations in parasites, including mimicry, crypsis and supernormal stimuli. This sometimes leads to vision-based host counter-adaptations and increased parasite trickery. Here, we review vision-based adaptations that arise in parasite-host interactions, emphasizing that these adaptations can be visual/sensory, cognitive or phenotypic in nature. We highlight recent breakthroughs in chemistry, genomics, neuroscience and computer vision, and we conclude by identifying important future directions. Moving forward, it will be essential to identify the genetic and neural bases of adaptation and to compare vision-based adaptations to those arising in other sensory modalities.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionColorHost-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorVisual PerceptionAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBirdsLife History Traitsanimal colorationavian visionbrood parasitismcoevolutionmimicrysensory ecology

Identifiers

PMID28533456
PMCPMC5444060
OpenAlexW2617997144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.