Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533455›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Coevolution of coloration and colour vision?

Olle Lind, Miriam J Henze, Almut Kelber, Daniel Osorio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Visual Ecology ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Implications From the Analogous Relationship Between Evolutionary and Learning Processes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The evolution of red color vision is linked to coordinated rhodopsin tuning in lycaenid butterflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Living Light 2018: Conference Report.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  17. The current and future state of animal coloration research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Olle LindDepartment of Philosophy, Cognitive Science, Helgonavägen 3, 22362 Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-4705
Miriam J HenzeQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0563-2539
Almut KelberDepartment of Biology, Lund Vision Group, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, 22362 Lund, Sweden almut.kelber@biol.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-2808
Daniel OsorioSchool of Life Sciences, John Maynard Smith Building, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-527X
Lund University · SEThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary relationship between signals and animal senses has broad significance, with potential consequences for speciation, and for the efficacy and honesty of biological communication. Here we outline current understanding of the diversity of colour vision in two contrasting groups: the phylogenetically conservative birds, and the more variable butterflies. Evidence for coevolution of colour signals and vision exists in both groups, but is limited to observations of phenotypic differences between visual systems, which might be correlated with coloration. Here, to illustrate how one might interpret the evolutionary significance of such differences, we used colour vision modelling based on an avian eye to evaluate the effects of variation in three key characters: photoreceptor spectral sensitivity, oil droplet pigmentation and the proportions of different photoreceptor types. The models predict that physiologically realistic changes in any one character will have little effect, but complementary shifts in all three can substantially affect discriminability of three types of natural spectra. These observations about the adaptive landscape of colour vision may help to explain the general conservatism of photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in birds. This approach can be extended to other types of eye and spectra to inform future work on coevolution of coloration and colour vision.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.

Indexed as

Color VisionPigmentationVisual PerceptionAnimal CommunicationAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsButterfliesColorModels, BiologicalPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebratePhylogenyadaptive landscapebird colour visionbutterfly colour visioncolorationcolour visionevolution

Identifiers

PMID28533455
PMCPMC5444059
OpenAlexW2618964890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.