Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533395›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life.

Tom A Williams, Gergely J Szöllősi, Anja Spang, Peter G Foster, Sarah E Heaps, Bastien Boussau, Thijs J G Ettema, T Martin Embley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diversity of electron-bifurcating COScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbial Evolution and Systematics: Archaea and Bacteria.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. DPANN Archaea and CPR Bacteria: insights into early cellular evolution?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. The emergence of metabolisms through Earth history and implications for biospheric evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Challenges in Assembling the Dated Tree of Life.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Tom A WilliamsSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom; tom.a.williams@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1072-0223
Gergely J SzöllősiMTA-ELTE Lendület Evolutionary Genomics Research Group, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Anja SpangDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter G FosterDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Sarah E HeapsInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Bastien BoussauUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Thijs J G EttemaDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden.
T Martin EmbleyInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBUppsala University · SEEötvös Loránd University · HUNatural History Museum · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G024707/1European Research Council 310039Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A root for the archaeal tree is essential for reconstructing the metabolism and ecology of early cells and for testing hypotheses that propose that the eukaryotic nuclear lineage originated from within the Archaea; however, published studies based on outgroup rooting disagree regarding the position of the archaeal root. Here we constructed a consensus unrooted archaeal topology using protein concatenation and a multigene supertree method based on 3,242 single gene trees, and then rooted this tree using a recently developed model of genome evolution. This model uses evidence from gene duplications, horizontal transfers, and gene losses contained in 31,236 archaeal gene families to identify the most likely root for the tree. Our analyses support the monophyly of DPANN (Diapherotrites, Parvarchaeota, Aenigmarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, Nanohaloarchaea), a recently discovered cosmopolitan and genetically diverse lineage, and, in contrast to previous work, place the tree root between DPANN and all other Archaea. The sister group to DPANN comprises the Euryarchaeota and the TACK Archaea, including

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ArchaealModels, GeneticAlgorithmsArchaeaEukaryotaGene DuplicationGene Transfer, HorizontalMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMultigene FamilyPhylogenyTemperatureArchaeaevolutionphylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID28533395
PMCPMC5468678
OpenAlexW2616865631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.