Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533379›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Learned response sequences in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Dan-Anders Jirenhed, Anders Rasmussen, Fredrik Johansson, Germund Hesslow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dan-Anders JirenhedAssociative Learning Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 221 84 Lund, Sweden; dan-anders.jirenhed@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-5150
Anders RasmussenAssociative Learning Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 221 84 Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik JohanssonAssociative Learning Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 221 84 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-0606
Germund HesslowAssociative Learning Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 221 84 Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associative learning in the cerebellum has previously focused on single movements. In eyeblink conditioning, for instance, a subject learns to blink at the right time in response to a conditional stimulus (CS), such as a tone that is repeatedly followed by an unconditional corneal stimulus (US). During conditioning, the CS and US are transmitted by mossy/parallel fibers and climbing fibers to cerebellar Purkinje cells that acquire a precisely timed pause response that drives the overt blink response. The timing of this conditional Purkinje cell response is determined by the CS-US interval and is independent of temporal patterns in the input signal. In addition to single movements, the cerebellum is also believed to be important for learning complex motor programs that require multiple precisely timed muscle contractions, such as, for example, playing the piano. In the present work, we studied Purkinje cells in decerebrate ferrets that were conditioned using electrical stimulation of mossy fiber and climbing fiber afferents as CS and US, while alternating between short and long interstimulus intervals. We found that Purkinje cells can learn double pause responses, separated by an intermediate excitation, where each pause corresponds to one interstimulus interval. The results show that individual cells can not only learn to time a single response but that they also learn an accurately timed sequential response pattern.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBlinkingCerebellar CortexCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalElectric StimulationFerretsLearningNerve FibersNeuronsPurkinje CellsReaction TimeSpatio-Temporal Analysiscerebellumclassical conditioninglearningPurkinje cellstiming

Identifiers

PMID28533379
PMCPMC5468669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.