Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28533198›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Chlamydia and HIV testing, contraception advice, and free condoms offered in general practice: a qualitative interview study of young adults' perceptions of this initiative.

Leah Ffion Jones, Ellie Ricketts, Katy Town, Claire Rugman, Donna Lecky, Kate Folkard, Anthony Nardone, Thomas Nathan Hartney, Cliodna McNulty

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah Ffion JonesSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Ellie RickettsSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Katy TownSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Claire RugmanSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Donna LeckySexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Kate FolkardSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Anthony NardoneSexual Health Promotion, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Thomas Nathan HartneyHIV/STI Department, National Infections Service, Public Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester.
Cliodna McNultyPrimary Care Unit, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, and visiting honorary professor, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpportunistic chlamydia screening is actively encouraged in English general practices. Based on recent policy changes, Public Health England piloted 3Cs and HIV in 2013-2014, integrating the offer of chlamydia testing with providing condoms, contraceptive information, and HIV testing (referred to as 3Cs and HIV) according to national guidelines.

aimTo determine young adults' opinions of receiving a broader sexual health offer of 3Cs and HIV at their GP practice. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative interviews were conducted in a general practice setting in England between March and June 2013.

methodThirty interviews were conducted with nine male and 21 female patients aged 16-24 years, immediately before or after a routine practice attendance. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic framework.

resultsParticipants indicated that the method of testing, timing, and the way the staff member approached the topic were important aspects to patients being offered 3Cs and HIV. Participants displayed a clear preference for 3Cs and HIV to be offered at the GP practice over other sexual health service providers. Participants highlighted convenience of the practice, assurance of confidentiality, and that the sexual health discussion was appropriate and routine. Barriers identified for patients were embarrassment, unease, lack of time, religion, and patients believing that certain patients could take offence. Suggested facilitators include raising awareness, reassuring confidentiality, and ensuring the offer is made in a professional and non-judgemental way at the end of the consultation.

conclusionGeneral practice staff should facilitate patients' preferences by ensuring that 3Cs and HIV testing services are made available at their surgery and offered to appropriate patients in a non-judgemental way.

Indexed as

General PracticeReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentChlamydia InfectionsCondomsContraceptionDelivery of Health CareEnglandFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningPatient PreferenceProgram Evaluationchlamydia screeninggeneral practiceHIV testingpatient preferenceprimary health caresexual healthyoung people

Identifiers

PMID28533198
PMCPMC5565869
OpenAlexW2619834836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.