Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28532419›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.

Nam V Hoang, Agnelo Furtado, Patrick J Mason, Annelie Marquardt, Lakshmi Kasirajan, Prathima P Thirugnanasambandam, Frederik C Botha, Robert J Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Integrative transcriptomic analysis reveals alternative splicing complexity and transcriptomic diversity in porcine placentas across altitudes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nam V HoangQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Agnelo FurtadoQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Patrick J MasonQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Annelie MarquardtQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Lakshmi KasirajanQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Prathima P ThirugnanasambandamQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Frederik C BothaQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Robert J HenryQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Room 2.245, Level 2, The John Hay Building, Queensland Biosciences Precinct [#80], 306 Carmody Road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. robert.henry@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the economic importance of sugarcane in sugar and bioenergy production, there is not yet a reference genome available. Most of the sugarcane transcriptomic studies have been based on Saccharum officinarum gene indices (SoGI), expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and de novo assembled transcript contigs from short-reads; hence knowledge of the sugarcane transcriptome is limited in relation to transcript length and number of transcript isoforms.

resultsThe sugarcane transcriptome was sequenced using PacBio isoform sequencing (Iso-Seq) of a pooled RNA sample derived from leaf, internode and root tissues, of different developmental stages, from 22 varieties, to explore the potential for capturing full-length transcript isoforms. A total of 107,598 unique transcript isoforms were obtained, representing about 71% of the total number of predicted sugarcane genes. The majority of this dataset (92%) matched the plant protein database, while just over 2% was novel transcripts, and over 2% was putative long non-coding RNAs. About 56% and 23% of total sequences were annotated against the gene ontology and KEGG pathway databases, respectively. Comparison with de novo contigs from Illumina RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the internode samples from the same experiment and public databases showed that the Iso-Seq method recovered more full-length transcript isoforms, had a higher N50 and average length of largest 1,000 proteins; whereas a greater representation of the gene content and RNA diversity was captured in RNA-Seq. Only 62% of PacBio transcript isoforms matched 67% of de novo contigs, while the non-matched proportions were attributed to the inclusion of leaf/root tissues and the normalization in PacBio, and the representation of more gene content and RNA classes in the de novo assembly, respectively. About 69% of PacBio transcript isoforms and 41% of de novo contigs aligned with the sorghum genome, indicating the high conservation of orthologs in the genic regions of the two genomes.

conclusionsThe transcriptome dataset should contribute to improved sugarcane gene models and sugarcane protein predictions; and will serve as a reference database for analysis of transcript expression in sugarcane.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenomicsPolyploidySequence Analysis, RNAAlternative SplicingExpressed Sequence TagsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA IsoformsRNA, MessengerSaccharumRNA IsoformsRNA, MessengerDe novo assemblyHybrid assemblyIsoform sequencingPolyploid transcriptomeSugarcaneSUGIT databaseTranscriptome assembly

Identifiers

PMID28532419
PMCPMC5440902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.