ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2017
Non-diagnostic based approaches to helping children who could be labelled ADHD and their families.
Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Stories of Hope: Young People's Personal Narratives About ADHD Put Into Context of Positive Aspects.Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- When ADHD knocks on the door - discourse theory as a frame to explore subject positions and mental wellbeing before diagnosis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Lost in explanation: internal conflicts in the discourse of ADHD psychoeducation.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- ADHD in the DSM-5-TR: What has changed and what has not.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Is ADHD a way of conceptualizing long-term emotional stress and social disadvantage?Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- The (Un)real Existence of ADHD-Criteria, Functions, and Forms of the Diagnostic Entity.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Article
- What children and young people learn about ADHD from youth information books: A text analysis of nine books on ADHD available in Dutch.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2020Article
- Liberating parents from guilt: a grounded theory study of parents' internet communities for the recognition of ADHD.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2019Article
- Experience of stress in parents of children with ADHD: A qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2019Article
- A biased ADHD discourse ignores human uniqueness.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health services are not always good for you. There are some troubling facts to confront such as the increase in the use of diagnostic based approaches and psychotropic medications for children and young people being associated with poorer rather than better outcomes. In this article I will outline some of the evidence around outcome as a result of treatment for young people diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and for those who are prescribed long-term stimulants. I will then discuss clinical approaches that move beyond a focus on symptom management that diagnostic paradigms encourage. This includes clinical models that take account of the diversity of contextual and relational issues that young patients present with and the possibility afforded of engaging in more positive and hopeful therapeutic approaches such as the Relational Awareness Programme (RAP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.