Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28532307›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action

Global estimates of country health indicators: useful, unnecessary, inevitable?

Carla AbouZahr, Ties Boerma, Daniel Hogan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence for national universal eye health plans.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carla AbouZahra CAZ Consulting , Geneva , Switzerland.
Ties Boermab Department of Information, Evidence and Research , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.
Daniel Hoganb Department of Information, Evidence and Research , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe MDG era relied on global health estimates to fill data gaps and ensure temporal and cross-country comparability in reporting progress. Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals will present new challenges, requiring enhanced capacities to generate, analyse, interpret and use country produced data.

objectiveTo summarize the development of global health estimates and discuss their utility and limitations from global and country perspectives.

designDescriptive paper based on findings of intercountry workshops, reviews of literatureon and synthesis of experiences.

resultsProducers of global health estimates focus on the technical soundness of estimation methods and comparability of the results across countries and over time. By contrast, country users are more concerned about the extent of their involvement in the estimation process and hesitate to buy into estimates derived using methods their technical staff cannot explain and that differ from national data sources. Quantitative summaries of uncertainty may be of limited practical use in policy discussions where decisions need to be made about what to do next.

conclusionsGreater transparency and involvement of country partners in the development of global estimates will help improve ownership, strengthen country capacities for data production and use, and reduce reliance on externally produced estimates.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsData CollectionGlobal HealthHumansBringing the indicators home: Country perspective on the utility of global 40 estimates for health indicators (WHO)capacitiescountry health information systemsdata users and usesethicsGlobal health estimateshealth statisticsmodelling

Identifiers

PMID28532307
PMCPMC5645718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.