Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28531909›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2017

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Stacey A Fedewa, W Dana Flanders, Kevin C Ward, Chun Chieh Lin, Ahmedin Jemal, Ann Goding Sauer, Chyke A Doubeni, Michael Goodman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05903885 (Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05903885 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,200ConditionsColorectal Cancer, PreventionArmsOn-site Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kit Distribution, On-site With Social Media Advertising Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kit Distribution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interrogating the Mechanistic Link between Neighborhood Deprivation and Colorectal Cancer Risk through Transcriptomic Analysis of Normal Colorectal Biopsies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey A FedewaFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
W Dana FlandersFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kevin C WardFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chun Chieh LinFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ahmedin JemalFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann Goding SauerFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chyke A DoubeniFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael GoodmanFrom Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
American Cancer Society · US

Funding

Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in average risk adults: Colonoscopy vs. FITR01CA213645 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Reducing Deaths from Colorectal CancerR01CA151736 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2010 to 2010
$491k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterval colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 3% to 8% of all cases of CRC in the United States. Data on interval CRC by race/ethnicity are scant.

objectiveTo examine whether risk for interval CRC among Medicare patients differs by race/ethnicity and whether this potential variation is accounted for by differences in the quality of colonoscopy, as measured by physicians' polyp detection rate (PDR).

designPopulation-based cohort study.

settingMedicare program.

participantsPatients aged 66 to 75 years who received colonoscopy between 2002 and 2011 and were followed through 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox models were used to estimate cumulative probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs) of interval CRC, defined as a CRC diagnosis 6 to 59 months after colonoscopy.

resultsThere were 2735 cases of interval CRC identified over 235 146 person-years of follow-up. A higher proportion of black persons (52.8%) than white persons (46.2%) received colonoscopy from physicians with a lower PDR. This rate was significantly associated with interval CRC risk. The probability of interval CRC by the end of follow-up was 7.1% in black persons and 5.8% in white persons. Compared with white persons, black persons had significantly higher risk for interval CRC (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.51]); the disparity was more pronounced for cancer of the rectum (HR, 1.70 [CI, 1.25 to 2.31]) and distal colon (HR, 1.45 [CI, 1.00 to 2.11]) than for cancer of the proximal colon (HR, 1.17 [CI, 0.96 to 1.42]). Adjustment for PDR did not alter HRs by race/ethnicity, but differences between black persons and white persons were greater among physicians with higher PDRs. LIMITATION: Colonoscopy and polypectomy were identified by using billing codes.

conclusionAmong elderly Medicare enrollees, the risk for interval CRC was higher in black persons than in white persons; the difference was more pronounced for cancer of the distal colon and rectum and for physicians with higher PDRs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIncidenceMaleMedicareRisk FactorsUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID28531909
PMCPMC5897770
OpenAlexW2618842626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.