ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2017
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05903885 (Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Using a Cross-sectional Partnership to Improve Prevention and Health Equity Among African Americans
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective Recruitment Strategies Utilized to Examine Dietary Practices of Blacks in New York City in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Pooled it
- The contribution of endoscopy quality measures to the development of interval colorectal cancers in the screening population: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2018Pooled it
- Interrogating the Mechanistic Link between Neighborhood Deprivation and Colorectal Cancer Risk through Transcriptomic Analysis of Normal Colorectal Biopsies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Using a cross-sectoral partnership to improve colorectal cancer screening and follow-up among African Americans in the United States: A protocol and preliminary results.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Mortality Trends in the United States Over 25 Years: A Story of Success and Inequity.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Testing the effects of segmented crowdsource-selected messages to improve intentions to follow colorectal cancer screening recommendations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Assessing Racial Disparities in Guideline-Concordant Care and Clinical Outcomes after Surgical Resection of Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Comparing ChatGPT3.5 and Bard recommendations for colonoscopy intervals: Bridging the gap in healthcare settings.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Interval Advanced Adenomas and Neoplasia in Patients with Negative Colonoscopy Following Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Difficulties and Disparities in Colorectal Cancer End-of-Life Care: A Patient's Story.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Impact of racial disparities in follow-up and quality of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer outcomes.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- "You're dealing with the bottom here…" understanding reasons for reduced utilisation: a qualitative study on colorectal cancer screening among vulnerable men at a drop-in centre in Denmark.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Association of Historical Housing Discrimination and Colon Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in the United States.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Social Determinants of Health and the Link to Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Diminishing racial disparities in the treatment of colon adenocarcinoma.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Article
- Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer as a Quality Metric-Identifying Opportunities to Improve Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Screening and Colonoscopy Quality Measures: Ethnic Disparities and Impact on Patients' Outcome.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterval colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 3% to 8% of all cases of CRC in the United States. Data on interval CRC by race/ethnicity are scant.
objectiveTo examine whether risk for interval CRC among Medicare patients differs by race/ethnicity and whether this potential variation is accounted for by differences in the quality of colonoscopy, as measured by physicians' polyp detection rate (PDR).
designPopulation-based cohort study.
settingMedicare program.
participantsPatients aged 66 to 75 years who received colonoscopy between 2002 and 2011 and were followed through 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox models were used to estimate cumulative probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs) of interval CRC, defined as a CRC diagnosis 6 to 59 months after colonoscopy.
resultsThere were 2735 cases of interval CRC identified over 235 146 person-years of follow-up. A higher proportion of black persons (52.8%) than white persons (46.2%) received colonoscopy from physicians with a lower PDR. This rate was significantly associated with interval CRC risk. The probability of interval CRC by the end of follow-up was 7.1% in black persons and 5.8% in white persons. Compared with white persons, black persons had significantly higher risk for interval CRC (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.51]); the disparity was more pronounced for cancer of the rectum (HR, 1.70 [CI, 1.25 to 2.31]) and distal colon (HR, 1.45 [CI, 1.00 to 2.11]) than for cancer of the proximal colon (HR, 1.17 [CI, 0.96 to 1.42]). Adjustment for PDR did not alter HRs by race/ethnicity, but differences between black persons and white persons were greater among physicians with higher PDRs. LIMITATION: Colonoscopy and polypectomy were identified by using billing codes.
conclusionAmong elderly Medicare enrollees, the risk for interval CRC was higher in black persons than in white persons; the difference was more pronounced for cancer of the distal colon and rectum and for physicians with higher PDRs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: American Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.