SynthesisPloS one2017
A narrative systematic review of factors affecting diabetes prevention in primary care settings.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Long-term effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention on cardiometabolic health of overweight and obese women.European journal of public health · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Pre-Myopic Children: Trends in Myopia Development and Management in Canada.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prediabetes Awareness Barriers and Enablers: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2020.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Use of an Electronic Health Record Order to Directly Refer Patients With Prediabetes to Community-Based Diabetes Prevention Programs.Annals of family medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators of self-care in adults with pre-diabetes: a directed qualitative content analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Should I Take Prediabetes Seriously or Not: A Qualitative Study on People's Perceptions of Prediabetes.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
- Starting the Conversation: Patient Perceptions of Self-Assessed Type-2 Diabetes Risk.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2025Article
- Quality priorities related to the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: results from the COMPAS + quality improvement collaborative.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of an Automated Text Message-Based Diabetes Prevention Program for Adults With Pre-diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Common barriers and enablers to the use of non-drug interventions for managing common chronic conditions in primary care: an overview of reviews.BMC primary care · 2024Review
- Primary care providers' perspectives on referrals to the Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative comparative study across varied referral patterns.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2024Article
- Making prediabetes visible in primary health care: a qualitative study of health care professionals' perspectives.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Adults' perceived health promotion needs in the prediabetes stage: a meta-synthesis study.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- A multiple case study of pre-diabetes care undertaken by general practice in Aotearoa/New Zealand: de-incentivised and de-prioritised work.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Unravelling the potential of social prescribing in individual-level type 2 diabetes prevention: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review protocol.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Personalized Medical Group Visits: A Novel Approach for the Care of Prediabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022Article
- Proximal and distal influences on dietary change among a diverse group with prediabetes participating in a pragmatic, primary care nurse-led intervention: a qualitative study.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes is impacting millions of people globally; however, many future cases can be prevented through lifestyle changes and interventions. Primary care is an important setting for diabetes prevention, for at-risk populations, because it is a patient's primary point of contact with the health care system and professionals can provide lifestyle counselling and support, as well as monitoring health outcomes. These are all essential elements for diabetes prevention for at-risk adults.
aimTo understand the factors related to the delivery and uptake of type 2 diabetes prevention interventions within primary care in higher income countries.
methodsFor this narrative systematic review, we combined qualitative and quantitative studies of diabetes prevention within a primary care setting for patients at-risk of developing the condition. We used an iterative approach for evidence collection, which included using several databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Pysch info, BNI, SSCI, CINAHL, ASSIA), where we combined diabetes terms with primary care terms. Narrative and thematic synthesis were utilised to identify the prominent themes emerging from the data.
resultsA database of 6646 records was screened by the research team, and 18 papers were included. Three major themes were identified in this review. The first theme of context and setting of diabetes progression includes the risk and progression of diabetes, primary care as a setting, and where the responsibility for change is thought to lie. This review also found mixed views on the value of preventative services within primary care. The second theme focused on the various patient factors associated with diabetes prevention such as a patient's motivation to modify their current lifestyle, perceptions and knowledge (or lack thereof) of the impacts of diabetes, lack of follow-up in healthcare settings, and trust in healthcare professionals. The third theme was centred on professional factors impacting on diabetes prevention which included workload, time constraints, resources, self-efficacy and knowledge as well as professionals' perception of patient motivations towards change.
conclusionThis review explored the factors influencing diabetes prevention in primary care, and identified the context of prevention, as well as patient and professional factors related to preventative services being offered in primary care. This systematic review complements previous reviews of real-world settings by exploring the significant factors in prevention, and the findings are relevant to academics, policymakers, patients and practitioners interested in understanding the factors associated with the delivery and uptake of diabetes prevention interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.