Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28531189›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Tandem duplications lead to novel expression patterns through exon shuffling in Drosophila yakuba.

Rebekah L Rogers, Ling Shao, Kevin R Thornton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Demonstration ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah L RogersDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-4464
Ling ShaoEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Kevin R ThorntonEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

Population genetics of gene duplications and copy-number variants in the DrosophiR01GM085183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
Population genomics of polygenic adaptationR01GM115564 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
Evolutionary Impacts of Chromosomal Rearrangements in DrosophilaF32GM099377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ROGERS, REBEKAH LEE · 2011 to 2013
$148k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM099377NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One common hypothesis to explain the impacts of tandem duplications is that whole gene duplications commonly produce additive changes in gene expression due to copy number changes. Here, we use genome wide RNA-seq data from a population sample of Drosophila yakuba to test this 'gene dosage' hypothesis. We observe little evidence of expression changes in response to whole transcript duplication capturing 5' and 3' UTRs. Among whole gene duplications, we observe evidence that dosage sharing across copies is likely to be common. The lack of expression changes after whole gene duplication suggests that the majority of genes are subject to tight regulatory control and therefore not sensitive to changes in gene copy number. Rather, we observe changes in expression level due to both shuffling of regulatory elements and the creation of chimeric structures via tandem duplication. Additionally, we observe 30 de novo gene structures arising from tandem duplications, 23 of which form with expression in the testes. Thus, the value of tandem duplications is likely to be more intricate than simple changes in gene dosage. The common regulatory effects from chimeric gene formation after tandem duplication may explain their contribution to genome evolution.

Indexed as

ExonsGene DosageGene DuplicationTandem Repeat Sequences3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularRecombination, Genetic3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID28531189
PMCPMC5460883
OpenAlexW2949575420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.