Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28530661›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2017

Causal evidence for retina-dependent and -independent visual motion computations in mouse cortex.

Daniel Hillier, Michele Fiscella, Antonia Drinnenberg, Stuart Trenholm, Santiago B Rompani, Zoltan Raics, Gergely Katona, Josephine Juettner, Andreas Hierlemann, Balazs Rozsa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predation without direction selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel HillierNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Michele FiscellaDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Antonia DrinnenbergNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Stuart TrenholmNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Santiago B RompaniNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Zoltan RaicsNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Gergely KatonaLaboratory of 3D Functional Network and Dendritic Imaging, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Josephine JuettnerNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas HierlemannDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-2468
Balazs RozsaLaboratory of 3D Functional Network and Dendritic Imaging, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Botond RoskaNeural Circuits Laboratory, Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 141801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How neuronal computations in the sensory periphery contribute to computations in the cortex is not well understood. We examined this question in the context of visual-motion processing in the retina and primary visual cortex (V1) of mice. We disrupted retinal direction selectivity, either exclusively along the horizontal axis using FRMD7 mutants or along all directions by ablating starburst amacrine cells, and monitored neuronal activity in layer 2/3 of V1 during stimulation with visual motion. In control mice, we found an over-representation of cortical cells preferring posterior visual motion, the dominant motion direction an animal experiences when it moves forward. In mice with disrupted retinal direction selectivity, the over-representation of posterior-motion-preferring cortical cells disappeared, and their responses at higher stimulus speeds were reduced. This work reveals the existence of two functionally distinct, sensory-periphery-dependent and -independent computations of visual motion in the cortex.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsCytoskeletal ProteinsDiphtheria ToxinFemaleMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationRetinaVisual CortexVisual PathwaysCytoskeletal ProteinsDiphtheria ToxinFRMD7 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID28530661
PMCPMC5490790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.