Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28530655›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

A quantitative and multiplexed approach to uncover the fitness landscape of tumor suppression in vivo.

Zoë N Rogers, Christopher D McFarland, Ian P Winters, Santiago Naranjo, Chen-Hua Chuang, Dmitri Petrov, Monte M Winslow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genes & diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Scaling perturbations: beyond genome-scale CRISPR screens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zoë N RogersDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Christopher D McFarlandDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Ian P WintersDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-3228
Santiago NaranjoDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Chen-Hua ChuangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Dmitri PetrovDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Monte M WinslowDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Genomics of rapid adaptation in the lab and in the wildR35GM118165 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Dmitri Petrov · 2016 to 2026
$8.3M
Cancer Systems Biology Scholars ProgramR25CA180993 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Molecular Dissection of Lung Cancer Progression and MetastasisR01CA175336 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
A Quantitative Multiplexed Platform for the Pharmacogenomic Analysis of Lung CancerR01CA207133 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI, WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2016 to 2018
$1.7M
High Throughput DNA Sequencer UpgradeS10OD018220 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, JOHN · 2014 to 2014
$596k
Somatic Engineering-based Models of Pancreatic CancerR21CA194910 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WINSLOW, MONTE MEIER · 2015 to 2016
$390k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175336NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207133NCI NIH HHS R21 CA194910NCI NIH HHS R25 CA180993NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118165NIH HHS S10 OD018220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer growth is a multistage, stochastic evolutionary process. While cancer genome sequencing has been instrumental in identifying the genomic alterations that occur in human tumors, the consequences of these alterations on tumor growth remain largely unexplored. Conventional genetically engineered mouse models enable the study of tumor growth in vivo, but they are neither readily scalable nor sufficiently quantitative to unravel the magnitude and mode of action of many tumor-suppressor genes. Here, we present a method that integrates tumor barcoding with ultradeep barcode sequencing (Tuba-seq) to interrogate tumor-suppressor function in mouse models of human cancer. Tuba-seq uncovers genotype-dependent distributions of tumor sizes. By combining Tuba-seq with multiplexed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing, we quantified the effects of 11 tumor-suppressor pathways that are frequently altered in human lung adenocarcinoma. Tuba-seq enables the broad quantification of the function of tumor-suppressor genes with unprecedented resolution, parallelization, and precision.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFemaleGenetic EngineeringHumansLentivirusLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiceModels, GeneticNeoplasms, ExperimentalPlasmidsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)DNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28530655
PMCPMC5495136
OpenAlexW2620242164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.