Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28530224›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Understanding trends in electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction rates.

Xinyan Liu, Jianping Xiao, Hongjie Peng, Xin Hong, Karen Chan, Jens K Nørskov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reaction Environment Engineering for Selective CAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The Chemistry of COChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. CO Spillover Is Not a Promoter for C─C Bond Formation in COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cu─O─Al Interfacial Engineering on Cu Nanowires for Durable COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Enhancing COMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Heterostructure Engineering in Metal Sulfides for Electrochemical COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  14. Electrochemical COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Progress in Cu-Based Catalyst Design for Sustained Electrocatalytic COAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Electrochemical COInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025
    Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyan LiuSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Jianping XiaoSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Hongjie PengSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Xin HongSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Karen ChanSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6897-1108
Jens K NørskovSUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to fuels presents one of the great challenges in chemistry. Herein we present an understanding of trends in electrocatalytic activity for carbon dioxide reduction over different metal catalysts that rationalize a number of experimental observations including the selectivity with respect to the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. We also identify two design criteria for more active catalysts. The understanding is based on density functional theory calculations of activation energies for electrochemical carbon monoxide reduction as a basis for an electrochemical kinetic model of the process. We develop scaling relations relating transition state energies to the carbon monoxide adsorption energy and determine the optimal value of this descriptor to be very close to that of copper.

Identifiers

PMID28530224
PMCPMC5458145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.