ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2017
Recent trends of gastric cancer treatment in Turkey.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03958032 (Effects of Sarcopenia on Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Sarcopenia on Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Gastric Cancer
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimally invasive versus open surgery for gastric cancer in Turkish population.Turkish journal of surgery · 2021Article
- The efficacy of clinical pathway in gastric cancer surgery.Turkish journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Surgical management of metastatic gastric cancer: moving beyond the guidelines.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common type of cancer and is the fourth most common death due to cancer in Turkey. Incidence and mortality rates are one of the highest among European countries. Despite the high rates, management of gastric cancer is still an issue of debate in Turkey and national guidelines have yet to be established. While the treatment plan following the diagnosis of gastric cancer is determined by a multidisciplinary meeting at high-volume centers, the plan in the majority of cases in Turkey is decided based on the decision of an individual physician. The primary goal of the treatment strategy is to obtain the best oncological outcomes and quality of life within the acceptable treatment-related morbidity. Therefore, R0 resection is intended by using standardized surgery with an individualized approach, while avoiding surgery if a curative resection is not possible. In this review, presenting on the recent trends of gastric cancer treatment including surgical, endoscopic, adjuvant/neoadjuvant and conversion treatment options in Turkey are aimed by exploring the institutional approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.