Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28529877›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

The dynamics of functional connectivity in neocortical focal epilepsy.

Mangor Pedersen, Amir Omidvarnia, Evan K Curwood, Jennifer M Walz, Genevieve Rayner, Graeme D Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamical Mechanisms of Interictal Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mangor PedersenThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: m.pedersen@brain.org.au.
Amir OmidvarniaThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Evan K CurwoodThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jennifer M WalzThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Genevieve RaynerThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Graeme D JacksonThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal epilepsy is characterised by paroxysmal events, reflecting changes in underlying local brain networks. To capture brain network activity at the maximal temporal resolution of the acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, we have previously developed a novel analysis framework called Dynamic Regional Phase Synchrony (DRePS). DRePS measures instantaneous mean phase coherence within neighbourhoods of brain voxels. We use it here to examine how the dynamics of the functional connections of regional brain networks are altered in neocortical focal epilepsy. Using task-free fMRI data from 21 subjects with focal epilepsy and 21 healthy controls, we calculated the power spectral density of DRePS, which is a measure of signal variability in local connectivity estimates. Whole-brain averaged power spectral density of DRePS, or signal variability of local connectivity, was significantly higher in epilepsy subjects compared to healthy controls. Maximal increase in DRePS spectral power was seen in bilateral inferior frontal cortices, ipsilateral mid-cingulate gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, caudate head, and contralateral cerebellum. Our results provide further evidence of common brain abnormalities across people with focal epilepsy. We postulate that dynamic changes in specific cortical brain areas may help maintain brain function in the presence of pathological epileptiform network activity in neocortical focal epilepsy.

Indexed as

AdultConnectomeEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeocortexYoung AdultConnectomicsDRePSDynamic connectivityfMRIFocal epilepsyInstantaneous phase synchrony

Identifiers

PMID28529877
PMCPMC5429237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.