Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28529840›Full record

ArticleCurrent transplantation reports2016

Adoptive Cell Therapy with Tregs to Improve Transplant Outcomes: The Promise and the Stumbling Blocks.

Mohamed B Ezzelarab, Angus W Thomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current transplantation reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Identification of a CD4Human immunology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed B EzzelarabStarzl Transplantation Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Angus W ThomsonStarzl Transplantation Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Alemtuzumab and Regulatory T Cells for Heart Transplant Tolerance in MonkeysU01AI091197 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THOMSON, ANGUS W · 2010 to 2016
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI091197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of regulatory T cells (Treg) to the induction and maintenance of tolerance is well-recognized in rodents and may contribute to long-term human organ allograft survival. The therapeutic efficacy of adoptively-transferred Treg in promoting tolerance to organ allografts is well-recognized in mouse models. Early phase 1/2 clinical studies of Treg therapy have been conducted in patients with type-1 (autoimmune) diabetes and refractory Crohn's disease, and for inhibition of graft-versus-host disease following bone marrow transplantation with proven safety. The feasibility of adoptive Treg therapy in the clinic is subject to various parameters, including optimal cell source, isolation procedure, expansion, target dose, time of infusion, as well as generation of a GMP-cell product. Several phase 1/2 Treg dose-escalation studies are underway in organ transplantation. Recent evidence suggests that additional factors are critical to ensure Treg safety and efficacy in allograft recipients, including Treg characterization, stability, longevity, trafficking, concomitant immunosuppression, and donor antigen specificity. Accordingly, Treg therapy in the context of organ transplantation may prove more challenging in comparison to other prospective clinical settings of Treg immunotherapy, such as type-1 diabetes.

Indexed as

cell therapyregulatory T cellstransplantation

Identifiers

PMID28529840
PMCPMC5435383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.